Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)

2001-12-07 Thread Brian D. Plikaytis
: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test) Brian wrote: actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case. It still comes back to the question of - relative to what? The orientation according to the scanner, or that displayed on the screen? Having a graphical

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)

2001-12-06 Thread Hersch Nitikman
And mathematicians. And as a maverick Aero engineer, I knew about them too. Hersch At 03:55 PM 12/06/2001 +1000, you wrote: Julian wrote: Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy) to represent the focus points I doubt that many folks on the list would have heard of

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)

2001-12-06 Thread Brian D. Plikaytis
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test) Julian wrote: Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy) to represent the focus points I doubt that many folks on the list would have heard of imaginary numbers, but I could be wrong

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)

2001-12-06 Thread Rob Geraghty
Brian wrote: actually polar coordinates might be more applicable in this case. It still comes back to the question of - relative to what? The orientation according to the scanner, or that displayed on the screen? Having a graphical interface with the ability to click on a point is harder to

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.2.11 Available (new focus test)

2001-12-05 Thread Rob Geraghty
Julian wrote: Maybe we should ask Ed to use complex numbers (x +iy) to represent the focus points I doubt that many folks on the list would have heard of imaginary numbers, but I could be wrong - there's a few electrical engineers out there I think! Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]