Harvey wrote:
Rob Geraghty wrote:
snip Want to bet that it wasn't
any individual musician who chased Napster?
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
And they paid for the WHOLE court case? I'm prepared to be educated here -
if they did pay for the whole thing out of their own money
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javascript is usually client-side, too, although it can be used on either
side.
Good grief. Just about every ASP file written depends on javascript.
For what it's worth, the code I mentioned IS javascript but it seems
to have been more important to
Rob writes:
For what it's worth, the code I mentioned IS
javascript but it seems to have been more
important to figure out whether I used the right
word ...
The difference between Java and Javascript is enormous, despite the similar
names, so it is important to refer to each correctly.
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Harvey wrote:
Rob Geraghty wrote:
snip Want to bet that it wasn't
any individual musician who chased Napster?
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
And they paid for the WHOLE court case? I'm prepared to be educated here -
if they did pay for the whole
I would definitely pursue the Encarta infringement. Mr. Bill deep
pockets Gates needs a few lessons in etiquette, it would appear.
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Harvey wrote:
musical (intellectual) property is now a *very* hot legal
item.
Only because it's worth billions to some very big
*400 (or even smaller)
image will look good on most screens, whilst at least limiting print use if
not web use.
Steve
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2001 11:22 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Stealing images
I save
Steve Greenbank wrote:
The point (other than an on-topic dig) is that a 1024*768 image
will have scroll bars round it at 1024*768 - you need to allow
a little for the edges of the window and the title bar. With
copyright (and bandwidth) worries smaller is also better as you
can make a
Harvey wrote:
musical (intellectual) property is now a *very* hot legal
item.
Only because it's worth billions to some very big corporations like Sony
and HMV. If it was only the artists screaming, the care factor would be
very small.
I maintain that the same will be true of imagery on web
, September 10, 2001 3:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Stealing images was Re: filmscanners:
Importance of Copyright on Images
Rob Geraghty wrote:
snip Want to bet that it wasn't
any individual musician who chased Napster?
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
Harvey
Harvey writes:
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
If it had been only them, they would have lost very early in the game.
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Harvey writes:
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
If it had been only them, they would have lost very early in the game.
Since this is your opinion vs my opinion, I'm not going to debate with youBut I
will point out that they
felt that their losses were
John wrote:
on 9/10/01 1:57 AM, Rob Geraghty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another neat piece of java code I saw recently pops up a message
if someone tries to use the right-click save-as option on a picture.
It's
relatively trivial to get around, but at least it's *some* sort of
on 9/10/01 7:24 PM, Rob Geraghty at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you mean javascript I think
yes that's a good idea. In fact I might search that out.
AFAIK it's java since it's client side code. The only Javascript I've used
is server side code in an ASP. But I don't want to start an
Rob writes:
AFAIK it's java since it's client side code.
Javascript is usually client-side, too, although it can be used on either side.
You'll know it's Java if it takes half an hour to execute; if it executes
instantly, it's Javascript.
Anyway, all you have to do is turn off Java or
14 matches
Mail list logo
