On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:45:35 -0700 shAf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It is most likely a simple matrix type profile as determined
by Ed, which also takes into account selectable film type. This is
speculation on my part, but I don't believe Ed uses a "conversion
engine", rather a
Mark writes ...
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 4:45 PM
... This is
speculation on my part, but I don't believe Ed uses a "conversion
engine", rather a mathematical matrix transform. ...
Micheal,
It is of no use to speculate,
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "film scanner list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 5:55 AM
What is more ... Ed informs me there is no such internal color
space as "VS RGB"... Vuescan simply carries scanned RGB from the
device to any of the selectable "color spaces".
Mark writes ...
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "film scanner list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 5:55 AM
What is more ... Ed informs me there is no such internal
color space as "VS RGB"... Vuescan simply carries scanned
RGB from the device to any of the
... having asked you to "stay tuned", I'm getting back to you.
However, what I've experimented with has led me into considerable
thought ... my apologies for this post's length :o)
First ... my conclusions remain the same ... Vuescan will
ultimately yield more color capacity (gamut)
