At 22:34 16/01/2001 +1000, you wrote:
"Roman Kielich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One Nikon LS30 buys at least 2 Nikon cameras.
I think you mean one LS2000 buys 2 Nikon cameras,
unless Nikon SLRs just got a lot cheaper than last I checked. ;)
Rob
LS30 was AUD1640, you can have Nikon camera
canning speed and perform other image processing tasks on the
fly."
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Dieder Bylsma" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 6:50 AM
Subject: filmscanners: What is a photomultiplier
tube
| Ok, what with all t
"Roman Kielich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One Nikon LS30 buys at least 2 Nikon cameras.
I think you mean one LS2000 buys 2 Nikon cameras,
unless Nikon SLRs just got a lot cheaper than last I checked. ;)
Rob
Tony wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jan 2001 22:34:12 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I think you mean one LS2000 buys 2 Nikon cameras,
unless Nikon SLRs just got a lot cheaper than last I checked. ;)
Are F5's that cheap in USA?!
I don't know - I live in Australia! I was thinking along the
At 23:50 15/01/01, Dieder wrote:
Ok, what with all the discussion about CCDs, A/D conversion etc, what is
the difference between the CCDs of a high end scanner and the
photomultiplier tubes of a drum scanner. How do they compare, what are
their differences? Why is a drum scanner such a high
At 11:43 AM 1/16/01 +1100, Julian wrote:
If that is true, then because you only have one sensor, you can engineer it
to greater tolerances, and read a smaller spot size and thus get better
resolution. Because you only have one sensor too, you can design the
amplifier and subsequent circuitry
