[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Quoton) wrote:
Michael Wilkinson wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Ok - I was confused. I was referring to 100 MHz DIMMs v. 133 MHz
DIMMs. I
: take it Win2K works fine with 100 MHz DIMMs?
"IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok - I was confused. I was referring to 100 MHz DIMMs v. 133 MHz DIMMs.
I
take it Win2K works fine with 100 MHz DIMMs?
Win2K doesn't care what the front side (memory) bus speed is. It just runs
faster with a faster bus.
Rob
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:37 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Win2K system requirements
| I would not run Win2K with a 100 MHz CPU if that is what Ironworks
| was asking. If it worked at all it would be horribly slow. Microsoft
| recommends a minimum of 133 MHz CPU.
|
| As for bus s
.
-Original Message-
From: IronWorks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Win2K system requirements
Thanks Eli. That was precisely my question. I have a 700MHz Pentium III
and 384 MB of DRAM but a 100 MHz CPU
