Art wrote:
>All the clues are there...
>1) Taken at Disneyland
>2) Typical atmospheric gradation
>3) look of woven paper stock
>4) "crinkled" look
>This one doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out!
>Heck, don't you know a painted backdrop when you see one? You think anyone
would go to D
Lynn Allen wrote:
The photo was shot at Disneyland, with the Matterhorn (a roller-coaster
ride, at D'land) in the background.
What got my attention was the sky area, a clear-day blue with typical
atmospheric gradadation down toward to the horizion. What appeared at first
to be "dust" didn't qui
Rob wrote:
>Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Right on. I don't think it was the scanner's fault, this time, although
Scanwit's density-range leave lots of room for improvement. :-) It was
definitely the camera (and the operator)--I'd have done better to meter the
grass, with t
Lynn: I ran into a similar situation with what looked like flyspecks all over 3
images in a roll I had developed. They were shot from a beach looking across a
bay in the the early evening with the sun at 2 o'clock. The camera was angled
just enough to prevent lens flare. My solution was to try
Lynn wrote:
> so in reflective color. Result: another poorly-exposed slide that looks
> fine on a projection screen, not-so-great on a 2700ppi scan.
Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Here's one I haven't seen very-well-addressed on the List before:
grain-aliasing on Ektachrome. Does it/can it exist? Oh, yes. I just ran
headlong into a real beauty!
The photo was shot at Disneyland, with the Matterhorn (a roller-coaster
ride, at D'land) in the background. Same scenario as I've
