The things one has to do to please these big corporations these
days ;-)
> Right now however I am scanning slides (Fujichrome
> Provia 100F at the moment) from a Kodak developing facility and all I
> have to do is blow them off
Robert Kehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't seen any degradation in image quality from Digital Ice, but I
> haven't done any extensive tests. Has anyone else?
My experience is that is causes slight softening of the focus - as do the
cleaning filters in Vuescan.
Rob
rty negatives from SS4000
>
>
> Frank,
>
> Do you use a dry towel. Or is it moistened with something?
>
> Bob
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Frank Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10,
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Deadman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Filmscanners <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
> on 9/11/00 8:05 pm, Robert Kehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
Frank,
Do you use a dry towel. Or is it moistened with something?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Frank Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:14 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
> O
Art wrote:
>Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
>people do not order reprints, and since the film is usually printed
>before it is cut and sleeved, a lot of the scratches are put on after
>the printer is done with them, or by the automated film gate (again,
>after
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> Geoff wrote:
> > I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
>
> Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
>
> Rob
Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
people do not order reprints, and since the film
Rob Geraghty wrote:
>
> Geoff wrote:
> > I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
>
> Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
>
> Rob
Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
people do not order reprints, and since the film
Geoff wrote:
> I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
Rob
2:14
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
>
>
> One thing I have always noticed is that slides seem to be much easier to
> keep clean than negatives. Negatives seem to attract dust like a magnet.
> When using the HP PhotoSmart
The dust problems are almost certainly to do with your scanning
environment and your general treatment of the negs. I have absolutely
NO dust problems with my SS4000... to the point that I literally spot
only one or two dots and then only on some negatives.
Thi
://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Kehl
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty neg
on 9/11/00 8:05 pm, Robert Kehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The Artix4000t definately gives me sharper higher resolution prints from y
> Epson 2000P especially at 13"x19". But the time I spend cleaning and
> spotting is a high price to pay. My conclusion? I am using the Nikon for
> my first
- Original Message -
From: Frank Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:04 AM
Subject: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
> Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
> scratchy
://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
> Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:49 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
>
Frank Paris wrote:
>
> Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
> scratchy negatives? I can't believe how filthy my negatives are and how much
> time I have to spend cleaning them up. I never had this problem with my HP
> PhotoSmart. Things seem to be getting worse,
> Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
> scratchy negatives?
I get very cross with my lab nowadays, especially the careless eejit who
sometimes sleeves the film, apparently wearing studded gauntlets and using
a doormat for a work surface.
Film I process myself
Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
scratchy negatives? I can't believe how filthy my negatives are and how much
time I have to spend cleaning them up. I never had this problem with my HP
PhotoSmart. Things seem to be getting worse, too. I just got through blowing
18 matches
Mail list logo
