Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Hi Dan, I am replying off list because I don't think my comparisons of the 3600 and the ss4000 is scientific by any means. I returned the 3600 for two reasons. The first is that it sounded like something was grinding inside the unit whenever it was in use. This may have been the reason I was

RE: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trozzo Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 3:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner Hi Dan, I am replying off list because I don't think my comparisons of the 3600 and the ss4000 is scientific by any

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Dan, would you mind telling me where you purchased your 3600? Still no sign of it showing up in Canada. Paul http://okphoto.webjump.com P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

BH Photo in New York city Dan OK Photo wrote: Dan, would you mind telling me where you purchased your 3600? Still no sign of it showing up in Canada. Paul http://okphoto.webjump.com P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876

Re(2): filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Paul, I'm in Canada too and I have recently (last week) talked with peoples at Kodak Canada about the RFS 3600 availability. They expect to start delivering to retailers tomorrow (Nov. 7) Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:26:53 -0800, OK Photo wrote: Dan, would you mind telling me where you purchased your

Re(2): filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Dan, Sorry for the delay, but I was away for the last days. And thanks a lot for your infos! Don't worry about "Mo", my mistake (I'm French speaking and should have wrote "Mb") "Mo is Méga octet, french expression for Megabyte. On Sat, 4 Nov 2000 16:05:44 -0600, Dan Kimble wrote: I am sorry but

Re(2): filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Kimble "Hemingway, David J" wrote: It's not shipping -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner Just came back from N.Y. phot

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

far I don't have any regrets returning the SS4000. Dan Kimble "Hemingway, David J" wrote: It's not shipping -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filmsc

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Thanks much for the info you have given us on the rfs 3600. It's a big help. Wondering if you tried to scan black white negs. and if so how were the results? Dave Small

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Sorry, but I don't have any BW negatives to test, but I do have a roll of that Kodak BW film that uses the C-41 process. I will shoot it when I have a chance and try it. One thing I forgot to mention in the previous post is that so far every frame I have scanned needed very little if any

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

"Mo" is "Mega-octets," French for "Megabytes!"

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Just came back from N.Y. photoexpo. Saw the new Kodak rfs 3600 scanner. Looks good but wondering if anyone has done a review on it yet, or has any personal experience with it . We have just ordered a 3600. I'm not sure what product availability is in the US but in Canada they are not available

Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

Please do let me know. I believe they are available in the U.S. Dave

RE: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner

It's not shipping -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:55 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner Just came back from N.Y. photoexpo. Saw the new Kodak rfs 3600 scanner. Looks good