On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:07:13 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
a few months later I can state that PAN-F scans a lot better, with
respect
to the D-Max problems, with my new Canon FS4000 (and latest Vuescan
version).
That says something very positive about the
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: scanning PAN-F (was: Polaroid Rebate)
Alessandro Pardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did. I experimented with various settings (long exposure
pass, exposure,
gamma etc.) but it seems that the most dense parts of PAN-F
are beyond
reach
Alessandro Pardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
a few months later I can state that PAN-F scans a lot better, with respect
to the D-Max problems, with my new Canon FS4000 (and latest Vuescan
version).
That says something very positive about the capabilities of the Canon.
Rob
On Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:40:17 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I wonder if anyone has tried PAN-F with a SS4000 or other Polaroid
scanner?
I have some negs on it from years ago, so will have a look. But PanF always
was notorious stuff, very easy to develop to such extreme DMax
Alessandro Pardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did. I experimented with various settings (long exposure pass, exposure,
gamma etc.) but it seems that the most dense parts of PAN-F are beyond
reach
for this scanner
I wonder if anyone has tried PAN-F with a SS4000 or other Polaroid scanner?
Rob
