Hi all -
I'm trying to do something that is really pushing the envelope of my
understanding of resolution optimization (a good thing!).
What I want to do is compare photographs taken with a 200mm lens with
and without a teleconverter to try and pinpoint some of the exact
degradation introduce
Following on from Tony's method here's mine - under a new topic as it has
nothing to do with Polaroid 120s. I don't think I'm too good at the actual
image processing side so I'm going to brush over a lot of that and describe
the overall workflow.
I am aiming to have scans of anything vaguely usef
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:06:41 -0700 Michael Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I would not apply unsharp mask to a file I was going to distribute to clients
or
> send for color reproduction because there may be further manipulation done
and
> sharpening added once the image is out of your hands
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 17:43:40 -0700 Noel Charchuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 1. Which of the three scanner software programs is the most likely to
> give me
> a usable scan?
IMO Vuescan.
> 2. For web images, should I set the final size pre-scan, and pick a 72
> dpi resolution
> then, or is
Thanks to all those offering assistance to my questions, it has been
very helpful. I will have to do some more experimenting, but at least
now I can start from an informed beginning.
Noel Charchuk
--
http://telusplanet.net/public/nhcharch
OTECTED]>
To: "Film Scanners" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:43 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Workflow questions
| Hello group,
|
| I have a few workflow questions that I hope to have answered by the
| group, in
| order to work on images for my website, and for
At 05:43 PM 20/02/01 -0700, you wrote:
>My computer is a Packard Bell PII, running Windows 95, with 48 MB of
>memory, and I have an Epson 860 Color Stylus printer on LPT 1. I am
reluctant to
>upgrade to Windows 98 or 2000, as I don't know if it will recognize some
of my
>legacy devices like the ol
Good point.
Spencer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Moore
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Workflow questions
I would not apply unsharp mask to a file I was going to
Noel,
I don't think that you would have any problems upgrading your PC. The best
thing to do is go on the net and see if the hardware that you own has
upgraded drivers for the OS that you want to upgrade to. Windows also
includes many of the drivers for older pieces of hardware.
As for the sca
I would not apply unsharp mask to a file I was going to distribute to clients or
send for color reproduction because there may be further manipulation done and
sharpening added once the image is out of your hands. I always save my archival
tiff files unsharpened.If I am publishing to the web or ma
My recommendation for web output is close what is recommended below with a
few minor differences.
Since you're using Photoshop, I recommend saving as a PSD instead of TIF so
all your layers and selections will remain editable. In addition, which may
be from personal preferences, I recommend ad
Hello group,
I have a few workflow questions that I hope to have answered by the
group, in
order to work on images for my website, and for printing to an inkjet
printer
for personal display.
I have a Nikon Coolscan II, and the last Nikon software update for it. I
also
have Silverfast 3, with the
12 matches
Mail list logo
