- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
My understanding is that there is a degradation or change returning from
CMYK to RGB but this is from what I
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Rob Geraghty wrote:
"Acer V" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
isn't the whole point of usb to be plug-n-play and also hot swappable?
USB, yes. But it depends on the OS and the drivers for the peripheral.
oh yea, the sofware end :) gotcha. thanks.
/Acer V
--
dum spiro, spero
true, that is the default behavior in windows. There are various levels of
cachine on files (not just a windows thing)
-application buffering
Usually inside either the C runtime library or part of the Java
BufferedReader/Writer classes. Contains a buffer that is written to the OS
file system
Everything I say is only guessing, but might be worthwhile considering:
1) The AC supply might have partially failed, providing incorrect voltage.
2) The USB cable might be intermittent, or the hub might be problematic.
I'd suggest trying another cable, if the scanner appears to be properly
PAUL GRAHAM wrote:
Art,
well... I've got a liquid gate for my DeVere's, and I've got carriers with
no glass, regular glass, anti newton glass, and vacuum coated anti newton
glass (best)
I use $2500 Apo-El-Nikkor lenses imported from Japan, (unavailable here)
(none of the others are
PAUL GRAHAM wrote:
maybe other scanners use a brighter lightsource and so gain depth of focus
etc, but this one doesn't. I expect there is some trade made by Nikon
against using tubes for LED spectrum, long life, heat, consistency or ?...
I think you are correct, that this was a decision
Flushing each line always puts a very heavy hit on performance, and unless
the log file is specifically for detecting crash problems, is unlikely to
work that way.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bill Ross) wrote:
Does anyone have any other ideas on how to preserve a logfile
being
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "film scanner list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 5:55 AM
What is more ... Ed informs me there is no such internal color
space as "VS RGB"... Vuescan simply carries scanned RGB from the
device to any of the selectable "color spaces".
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Henk de Jong wrote:
Laurie Solemon wrote:
Out of curiosity, how many timed did you do this and what sorts of
changes did you see?
I took a picture, saved, closed and re-opened it ten times.
After every step (save, close and re-open) I compared the new image with the
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001, Laurie Solomon wrote:
However, my experiences with .jpg files has not been along the lines of
increasing artifacts with each iteration; when I have gotten artifacts in
.jpg files that were opened and resaved without any editing or changing of
quality levels, it has been
No-one has commented on the difference between my results
a bit of lace jpegged 10 times), posted on 30Mar, and
Henk's image of a letter on a plain background, similarly
treated. I can assure folk that I saved each image under a
new name and only *then* closed it before reloading it.
Is it
Hi Peter,
Dave King wrote
I've spent alot of effort learning how to get the best 24x36"
prints
possible from an Epson 7000 (it's been fun:), but at no point
along
the way have I felt the LS-30 was the weakest link in the chain,
far
from it in fact. I'm sort of amazed it's as good as
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Everything I say is only guessing, but might be worthwhile considering:
1) The AC supply might have partially failed, providing incorrect voltage.
2) The USB cable might be intermittent, or the hub might be problematic.
I'd suggest trying another cable, if the
Mark writes ...
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "film scanner list"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 5:55 AM
What is more ... Ed informs me there is no such internal
color space as "VS RGB"... Vuescan simply carries scanned
RGB from the device to any of the
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 00:35:08 -0500 Gordon Tassi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I believe that it is
in the part of the work flow that deals with the transfer of the image to the
printer. I bought an Epson Stylus Photo 700 about 2.5 years ago and it
constantly
changes its values, especially
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 08:47:54 -0600 Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Concerning the CMYK values for skintones, your guidelines appear to be more
or less correct. I have found Dan Margulis's guidelines to be a bit better
and empirically more accurate. He maintains that, for
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:11:08 -0800 Chris Hargens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On the photo.net web site I read a discussion =
(http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=3D001JxX) in which =
a couple of people mentioned a new Canon 4000 dpi scanner that should be =
coming out soon,
On Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:28:48 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Epson does make a few professional printers which are designed with
pre-press in mind. I'm not sure it's fair to expect color profiling
built into a printer that sells for a few hundred dollars. It isn't the
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:14:37 -0800 PAUL GRAHAM ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Nikon makes and sells a glass holder for the scanner (and the 8000 too) so
what's the problem?
Worth knowing. Is this retro-fittable to the LS1000/LS30/LS2000 - which all
used the same design glassless type?
--- You wrote:
Also I am fed up with the truly vast waste of ink and paper, and especially
time. In all my years of darkroom printing I have never come across such an
unruly, infuriating and wasteful process with the exception of lith
printing - my record there is 4 days to produce a single
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:02:58 -0600 Stan Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
David, under what circumstances should the focus box be selected in Insight?
The help file doesn't give much detail.
Just leave AF turned on all the time. I can't imagine any circumstances where
you'd want unsharp
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:12:13 -0800 JimD ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The more I scan images with my ss4000 the more I realize
how much I need to learn.
You are not wrong.
Should I be setting white and black points in the
scanning software(Vuescan, insight, SilverFast...whatever)
to get
On Sun, 01 Apr 2001 03:04:06 +0200 Rome ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Next day I spent the morning setting up ColorSync profiles on my Mac for
Photoshop and my monitor, then plugged the Minolta in again to do some more
scanning with ColorSync now in operation - But now the little green light on
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:35:31 -0500 (EST) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
My question, for those of you who *are*
professional photographers, is whether or not you think I'm wrong for doing
a watercolor painting from your very good work.
It's technically an actionable breach of
On Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:03:51 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
By the sound of what Tony (I think) mentioned, the lower illumination
provided
by the LEDs compared to other much brighter light sources leads to a lack of
depth of field.
I *was* just guessing, but it seems likely.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 14:01:25 -0500 (EST) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
At the risk of *again* being redundant, not all "Filmscanners" do printouts
(nor is it off-topic). :-)
It is heading toward surreal and bizarre, however. Now we aren't even debating
Epsons, but why there aren't
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 22:19:58 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Now, a "new" problem is
making the rounds. Apparently the depth of field at the film plane is
so limited (probably due to the low illumination level of the LEDS
forcing Nikon to use a larger open lens) that
Info from Canon here:
4000dpi scanner
http://www.usa.canon.com/press/021201e.html
And here's their new 2400dpi flatbed/tranny scanner
http://consumer.usa.canon.com/scanners/csd2400uf/index.html
Tim A
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
With 8bit, you don't have much scope for adjustments after
acquisition, so
should get as close as possible to the final, desired result. The
reason is
that with 8 bits, you get rounding errors during successive mathematical
operations on the data.
That's kind of only part of the reason.
Rome wrote:
Okay, I'm new to this... What is this 'Vuescan' you all talk about?
Do I need it?
Adam
___
Need advice on Rome? Ask ROMEBUDDY
http://www.romebuddy.com
ROMEBUDDY.COM
Tony wrote:
unless you sell it or publish it (oh damn, you just did)...
Yeah, "Damn!" Not to mention "Whoops!" I guess now all I can do now is put
furniture in front of all the doors, turn off the lights, and wait for the
Copyright Police.
Maybe it's time for another l-o-o-o-ng holiday! ;-)
At 3600 dpi full frame, I get a 51MB file...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2001 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Kodak RFS3600 - max file sizes
Just a quicky, what is the
What sticks in my craw isn't everyone copying Xerox so much as Apple's
litigation on behalf of the look and feel of their particular copy...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hayward at Hopco) wrote:
Gosh - what would have happened if MS had licensed the GUI
design from Xerox. Maybe XRX would not in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert E. Wright) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
Another problem that comes to mind is that scanners
34 matches
Mail list logo
