Thanks for the examples, Henry.
I agree that Ed should separate the filters - I have a non-IR scanner, and
am not a user of Vuescan yet, but this function would probably tip me into
the camp.
But ONLY if it doesn't soften my image as much as your samples indicate..
Mark T.
At 06:02 PM
This is off-topic, but slightly related, in that all the pictures in this
album were scanned on my SS4000 using VueScan and Fuji Provia 100F film.
Every picture was too saturated and I had to reduce color saturation in
Photoshop. I'm satisfied with the results, however.
jimhayes wrote:
There are restrictions on my $200 rebate: 1) The coupon is only good towards the
purchase of a Phillips, Magnavox, or Norelco product, 2) Even then it can only be
applied towards 80% max of purchase price, 3) A maximum of two products can be
applied
towards the rebate.
Cooke, Julie wrote:
It is safest to burn at 2x, although I always burn at 6x. This depends on
the buffer underrun size of the CD recorder (why Plextors are especially
reliable).
Taken from http://www.fadden.com/cdrfaq/
"The CD recording process can't be interrupted in mid-session.
Michael Moore wrote:
In regard tp speed of the burn, it is my understanding that it is best to use a
slow burn speed (2x) as opposed to the higher speeds if one wants to minimize
potential read errors on client's computers...any comments?
Mike Moore
My experience is the maximum speed
It would appear I'm being punished for making some negative comments
about Nikon on this list ;-)
My Nikon 801s SLR autofocus camera (also called the 8008s) has given up
its film transport system for the second time in its life. (repaired by
Nikon last time at a minor fortune).
My 20-30
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your samples
indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
Rob
Advice for preventing buffer underruns is scattered throughout
this FAQ. A
brief summary:
One thing I wish the CD recording software did was give you an option to
VERIFY the burn went OK.
If you don't go the ICE route and live in a dusty environment (or work
with negatives from periods of your life when your storage habits were
not the best, as I do) a graphics tablet becomes an extraordinary
blessing. Helps in many ways, but makes using the clone tool for
spotting so much quicker
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
If you look at the first example on my page you will see that it was scanned
with version
Anyone know what else Phillips makes besides TV's and CDR's that would be
reliable?
They make very good light bulbs. $200-worth should last quite a few years.
;-)
Maybe I should replace my stereo?g
I wouldn't do that. Because I had to, and its name was Magnavox. Ditto a
VCR.
Best
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your
samples indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at
higher settings, but it's hard to know. Only separating the
features would make it possible to tell.
Rob
One could go back and try dust removal
From: Bob Shomler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5 (or some release
before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was added to vuescan).
Again, I refer you to this page I set up that does just what you suggest:
A large, heavy trackball on stainless steel rollers with software providing
precision control over the ballistics of the pointer is also excellent. I
used the new Kensington Expert Mouse Pro and was amazed how far superior it
is even to an optical mouse. I used it until I switched to Windows
Bob writes ...
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your
samples indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at
higher settings, but it's hard to know. Only separating the
features would make it possible to tell.
Rob
One could go
I run my plextor at x8 all the time
If the manufacturers say it will do it then it damn well should !
I use a seperate partition for loading up the files and make sure that
the patition where the software writes to before dumping is also
empty,works a treat and we are writing CDs every day ,no
i have had a few problems with my f 100 but Nikon fixed them quickly under
warranty. the f 100 and all f series are WONDERFUL CAMERAS check them out.
joanna
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular spots that
are dust / scratches. Shouldn't the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and sharp?
John M.
Several months ago I noticed that Tony Sleep had mentioned Gear software for
CD writing in one of his e-mails. I contacted the company and tried their
product for a month before purchasing. I have been very pleased with the
product. I can write 12X with no problem and without taking any
John Matturri writes ...
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal
soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular
spots that are dust / scratches. Shouldn't
the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and sharp?
Hi, Mark!!!
Are these wipes wet or dry? I'd like to try your method, as I don't have
ICE, and spend 'WAY too much time despotting my pictures!!!
Thanx!!!
Guy Clark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 6:59 PM
To:
Digital ICE from Applied Science Fiction should not soften the image. It
identifies defects and corrects them. Even if there is a single strand of
hair on a models face, it should still be there after the defects are
removed. I have an example of an old Marilyn Monroe image taken by George
"Bob Shomler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5
(or some release before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was
added to vuescan).
I still have several versions prior to 6.6. I'll see if I can give it a go.
Rob
"John Matturri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular spots that
are dust / scratches. Shouldn't the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and
"Jack Phipps" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital ICE from Applied Science Fiction should not soften the image.
Jack, are you talking about the current version of ICE, or the version
implemented on the Nikon LS30, LS2000 and Minolta Scan Elite?
If you're talking about the new version we'll have to
Looking ahead to my getting a neg/slide scanner I downloaded Vuescan to see
what it was all about -Up to now I have been using Fotolook and Fotosnap
with my Agfa Snapscan flatbed ,this being the software supplied with it .
Even with the crosshatching on the trial version i can see that the
I use a HP 5200C flatbed, and the Vuescan is so much better and faster, that
it's way past funny. HP is an excellent company, and even replaced my
earlier model 5200 after the warranty expired at no cost to myself (not even
shipping), but the included software is a joke. I had been using Vuescan
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Austin Franklin wrote:
One thing I wish the CD recording software did was give you an option to
VERIFY the burn went OK.
Me, too. I wish there was a way of running scandisk on a CDR.
--
Terry Carroll | No representations, warranties or characterizations
Santa
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Berry Ives wrote:
on 2/15/01 1:21 PM, Terry Carroll at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Michael Moore wrote:
There's also the educational version of Photoshop, if you can qualify for
it (hey, enroll in an evening class in some subject you're
I have just subscribed to this group in the last couple of days, and
wanted to introduce myself. My name is Noel, I live in Calgary, Alberta,
Canada. I installed a used Nikon Coolscan II, also known as the LS 20,
and have just begun to experiment with it.
I shoot mainly scenic and nature shots,
on 2/15/01 2:35 PM, Sumtingwong at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the original Scan Dual, and if the II is anything like it, you have
made a very good choice. A great value and good to learn with.
Spencer Stone
Armando said:
Since we invested a lot of money in this magazine, I
I run my SCSI Plextor at 12X all the time. I didn't even know you could slow
it down.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Wilkinson
Sent: Friday,
When you do a scan using the Nikon interface do you have the "CleanImage"
(Nikon's old name for Digital ICE) in the "Mode: On (Sharpen)" or "Mode: On
(Normal)"? The mode Nikon calls "Mode: On (Normal)" actually blurs the image
slightly. You should run in "Mode: On (Sharpen)". This should solve
Hi Noel
I'm not Tony Sleep (our host), just another guest, but I'll
say welcome to you.
Is there an FAQ? If you didn't find this list via Tony's web
site, you should go there straightaway:
http://www.halftone.co.uk/
And there is a searchable archive of messages at
At 6:07 PM -0500 2/16/01, Edwin Eleazer wrote:
The improvement over the HP software was so amazing
in terms of results, that I now have a whole new respect for the potential
of this particular flatbed, scans from prints are often amazing in the level
of detail.
Edwin, I'm with you and
Hi all: I have a Ricoh CD Burner and Adaptec software. After reading this
thread, I wonder if the test that the Adeptec software performs is not the
same as doing scan disk. I thought it did. Am I wrong?
Gordon
Terry Carroll wrote:
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Austin Franklin wrote:
One thing
Robert Logan keeps an archive accessible to the group at
http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Noel Charchuk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Film Scanners" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:31 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Introduction
| I have
on 2/16/01 5:03 PM, Berry Ives at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just bought a Scan Dual II but have not set it up yet. Hope to do so this
weekend. I have a Mac, so Vuescan is not available for me. I'll make some
comments after I have some experience on the scanner...soon, I hope.
I have
38 matches
Mail list logo
