In a message dated 3/4/2001 12:42:54 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After I saw the mis-registration for LEP, I
scanned again at 16x MP only. I couldn't see where LEP improved over
16x MP.
If you have a Nikon LS-2000, the 16x multi-pass scanning will
probably produce better results.
(Story now hopelessly continued:)
Actually what I told below is not completely true / correct. If 'bit' is
meant instead of 'byte', the shortcut 'bit' is used and not 'b'.
During an assignment that I did at ATT (Lucent) I made the mistake to
calculate
522 Mbit as
In a message dated 3/3/2001 6:35:33 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. In the Color balance tab, what is the difference between "Neutral" and
"Auto Levels?"
Neutral doesn't change the ratio of red to green to blue. Auto levels
uses the brightest point to determine the ratio.
2. Also
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - let me know if you
don't like these changes or if you'd like to see things done
differently:
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out"
Ed,
don't you ever sleep. You were on-line when it was 9:30am. in
Scotland.
Regarding that re-calibrate function for the CanoScan FS2700.
It is not totally evident that the calibration cycle has been
completed. Any chance of a screen message to tell the user to insert
You could try www.speedgraphic.co.uk in the UK. They had one listed on the
last price list they sent me. Tempting...
Julie
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2001 9:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Where to
At 3:45 AM -0500 3/5/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing the exposure time will saturate the CCD in the bright
parts. Some (most?) CCD's will bleed light from overexposed
pixels into nearby pixels, which messes up dark areas that are
near bright areas.
This is the reason that I resisted
Ed writes ...
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - ...
If you have strong feelings about my doing things
differently, please let me know soon.
I like these
You could try www.speedgraphic.co.uk in the UK. They had one listed on the
last price list they sent me. Tempting...
Their website still says that they're due in March/April (so they might
have them...) at 699 and 1199 inc. VAT for the two new models.
Stuart
Ed,
Forgive me for not replying to your list. I will in another post.
Yesterday, I fired up my LS-30 for the first time in several months to
scan a Kodachrome slide. I was blown away by the improvement in VueScan in
handling Kodachromes! I went into Nikonscan just to verify that it wasn't
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Increasing the exposure time will saturate the CCD in the bright
parts. Some (most?) CCD's will bleed light from overexposed
pixels into nearby pixels, which messes up dark areas that are
near bright areas.
Ed,
When the Long exposure pass was
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix? Maybe someone on the list could point me to
a website description.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 2:45 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - A few technical questions
| In a
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3) Reorganize the tabs on the right side to make them
a bit more logical and useful (these suggestions came
from a helpful user):
The suggested reorganization would definitely be an improvement, and the
groupings are logical. However, I would
Ed,
If #1 means that it would be possible to view them at 100%, I think it would
be useful, just as viewing images at 100% in Photoshop provides the most
utility.
Count me as a YES for the rest.
Bob Reilly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
IronWorks writes ...
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix?
3 by 3 is the small matrix (or "kernal") around the pixel to be
filtered ... i.e., its nearest neighbors. Other common filter kernals
are 5x5 (a pixel beyond nearest neighbor), and 7x7 ... and even
larger.
shAf :o)
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 4:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| 1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that will double
| (or halve) the size of either the preview or scan
1.My results on the Nikon LS-30 have been best with manual crop. The
corner location is manual, but that means I can set it where I want.
2.I don't think so. The crop you select is the only one used for that
scan, whether it is for raw file only or TIF or JPG or any combination.
3.
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate but unreformable
byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
2)On the Window tab uncheck "Blink crop box"
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Software City" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 10:54 AM
In a message dated 3/5/2001 1:52:06 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix?
3 by 3 is the small matrix (or "kernal") around the pixel to be
filtered ... i.e., its nearest neighbors. Other common filter kernals
are 5x5 (a pixel beyond nearest neighbor), and
Very interesting, Ed. How does the program know how much fading there was,
vs just a difference in what was in front of the camera lens?
At 03:45 AM 03/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
In a message dated 3/4/2001 8:39:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the scan in Vuescan's memory the same as
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window
'live', i.e., when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the
preview. That would make a whole lot of difference.
At 05:56 AM 03/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the
VueScan
user interface, and
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:42:26 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does the program know how much fading there was,
vs just a difference in what was in front of the camera lens?
It analyzes the colors of the film grains.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 3/5/2001 12:34:39 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the Long exposure pass was first discussed, you mentioned that
certain scanners had different options for long exposure levels (like 2x,
3x, 4x, etc). However, Vuescan doesn't seem to give you access to setting
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:43:20 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate but unreformable
byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
The "Clean" option shouldn't visibly soften the image. Is it softening it?
Is this with Kodachrome film or
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:46:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That
would make a whole lot of difference.
The problem with this is that the
IronWorks writes ...
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate
but unreformable byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
...
I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image except
in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in for
"scrub"
I just upgraded to 6.7.5 from an earlier version.
When I do a final scan with the SS4000, instead of the carrier being pulled
through continuously, now it's moving with a start-stop motion. Is that an
expected change?
I don't have the multiple pass or long pass options checked.
Stan
In Vuescan, what exactly does the ColorWhit point setting indicate? If the
ColorWhite point is set to 0.5% (default), does that mean that the 0.5%
brightest pixels will be set at 255,255,255? And ditto for Black point?
Why is the default White point set to 0.5%, but the RGB components change
Ed wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface...These are the main things I'm thinking of clip
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that will double
(or halve) the size of either the preview or scan images. While
zoomed, the preview or scan window will
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
The suggestions sound good (especially the preview zoom). There's another thing I
would find useful (although I might be a minority of one).
I still find
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix?
3 by 3 is the small matrix (or "kernal") around the pixel to be
filtered ... i.e., its nearest neighbors. Other common filter kernals are
5x5 (a pixel beyond nearest neighbor), and 7x7 ... and even larger.
That's definitely CG Programmer talk. As Spock would
shAF writes:
(4) I think we all need to come up with how to better set the file paths
... or maybe I simply need to understand your current philosophy and
experiment more. But I wish I could consistently store the settings in a
specific location, independent of where I put my projects. Can I
Hersh wote:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That would
make a whole lot of difference.
That was an incarnation in a much earlier 6.x Vuescan version (possibly a
Beta), and I liked it
On Mon, 5 Mar 2001, shAf wrote:
I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image except
in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in for
"scrub" "scour" because of his grain removal algorithm is used(?)
Ed,
I think many on the list would vote for a
Just one more general request not related to the specifics of the changes:
I and several/many others save our Vuescan.ini file and then replace the
.ini in the new program with our saved settings. With all the changes on
layout you are anticipating, please warn us if and when a new version
What I mean is that if I set rotation to 90ccw, I'd like to see that happen
to the image in the preview window. And if I propose a change in 'white
point', e.g., that the effect would show in the preview, so I could change
my mind if I didn't like it. Or, if I change the film type, the effect
YES !
Thanks Ed !
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 11:56 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
I'm thinking about some improvements to the
Kodachrome 6.7.4. I'll load 6.7.5 tonight let you know.
Sorry for the incomplete post.
Ken Jaskot
- Original Message -
The "Clean" option shouldn't visibly soften the image. Is it softening
it?
Is this with Kodachrome film or Ektachrome film? Is this with
VueScan 6.7.5 (this
Maybe my request reflected a lack of appreciation of where else to go for
the same features.
At 06:29 PM 03/05/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Hersh wote:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That
Collin wrote:
I think many on the list would vote for a separate checkbox control to
enable grain removal independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.
I'd vote for that. Not necessarily because it would help a lot - more because
at the moment I have no way to tell what difference it makes
Michael wrote:
I concur, and that recent addition (not having to go to the Vuescan
program files for the "crops") was really helpful. Paths are tough,
and any improvements here (and there've been many) are welcome.
IMO something like the Microsoft Common Dialog Box would be a great boon
for
Ed Hamrick wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
The only interface feature of vuescan which regularly drives me crazy is
resizing the outline for the crop. Sometimes dragging an edge moves the
whole box,
Title: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
on 3/5/01 3:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
I just started to
Joel Wilcox wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out" button that
will double
(or halve) the size of either the preview or scan
images. While
zoomed, the preview or scan window will have scroll
bars.
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be
Rob Geraghty wrote:
IMO something like the Microsoft Common Dialog Box would be a great boon
for setting the paths. That way it's done visually and you don't have to
remember or type the text by hand. I'm talking about interface style when
I mention the common dialog box - it would
Separating the grain reduction from the cleaning processes would be the
change that will finally get me to pay for Vuescan - I keep checking it
every now and then waiting for the day that the advantages will be
sufficient for me to open the wallet!
(You've no idea how hard it is to remove
Alan wrote:
I agree that the dialog box would be a good thing, but I do
have to point out that directory creation already happens,
and automatically, if you enter a pathname into the raw,
TIFF, or JPEG file name fields!
Which is nice, but less foolproof than the common dialog box.
If you
Something in the nature of clean light, medium, and heavy perhaps?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Shomler" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
| I though Ed made the
A more responsive abort button would be nice. Not infrequently I find
myself having made a mistake but spending a good deal of time while the
scan is occurring waiting for a window when I can abort. Not sure if
this might be due to something about my system though.
John M.
51 matches
Mail list logo
