RE: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Laurie Solomon
Johnny, There is no one US statute or even set of statutes at the federal level. Each state has its own statutes and /or sets of applicable statutes; some of the state statutes recognize things that the relevant federal laws do not as well as recognizing things that other states do not. Most of

filmscanners: remove

2001-05-21 Thread Ranjana Lokanathan
removeGet your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Arthur Entlich
Douglas Landrum wrote: Do photographers wandering around the street really get these things? If so, what so they say? Yes, some do. Mine is very simple... by signing this document, you give up all rights and privileges granted you under all jurisdictions as a result of your assumed

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Goggin
My street releases are two paragraphs. A friend has a model release printed on the back of his business card ... obviously, it's not very long but he feels it's better than nothing and they're much more convenient to carry around than a sheaf of papers. He also prefers a cash payment on the

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Lynn Allen
Excellent post, Douglas. And more enlightening, probably, than my story of the runaway excursion (which did happen in California, by the way). With the 3 Stooges decision, one can see that the law seems to favor whomever wants to be vindictive enough to pursue it. One has to wonder how healthy a

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Lynn Allen
Beautiful, Art. A simple statement that says it all. You're gonna get crucified for this, I hope you know. :-) Best regards--Lynn --Original Message-- From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: May 21, 2001 11:47:37 AM GMT Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT:

filmscanners: MatchPrint?

2001-05-21 Thread Richard Starr
Now that I've done some serious scanning with my brain dead Nikon 3510AF, it occurs to me that I should go to some old negatives that I used in a show 15 years ago. I did fastidious 11X14 prints on Kodak material and sold a few, too. I'm wondering if I could reproduce them faithfully from the

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread John Matturri
I wonder if asking for a release could create additional problems; once someone has refused to sign you have an explicit lack of consent for the photograph to be used. Once you ask, might not you be more committed to ceding to the subject's wishes. In any event, unless someone does relatively

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
There are various Releases at http://lawyers.about.com/careers/lawyers/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http:/ /www.ibiblio.org/nppa/biz/forms/ Maris - Original Message - From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 21, 2001 9:09 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners:

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread John Matturri
Does anyone know a case where there has been a successful suit against a published or exhibited streetphotograher on privacy grounds? There was a mention of a Cartier-Bresson case before. But on reading the Stirling article in turns out that it wasn't the photograph that was at issue but its

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Lynn Allen
Yeah, but I wonder about the fine print! :-) OTOH, it's a darned good idea. Of course, Street People, if they know the guy is giving out $1 bills, might hog the camera! Kinda restricts your subject matter a little! :-) --LRA My street releases are two paragraphs. A friend has a model release

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Johnny Deadman
on 5/21/01 11:07 AM, Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are various Releases at http://lawyers.about.com/careers/lawyers/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?site=http:/ /www.ibiblio.org/nppa/biz/forms/ nice one! this is great http://www.ibiblio.org/nppa/biz/forms/pocket_release.html

Re: filmscanners: which space?

2001-05-21 Thread Lynn Allen
Hi, Paul-- Although I've read the manual and Real World Adobe Photoshop, my monitor will not/does not adjust to the Adobe color spaces--or else I'm not dedicated enough to follow it out the window, as it were. Since I record to CD and don't do printouts regularly, sRGB works fine--until I *want*

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Jeffrey Goggin
Yeah, but I wonder about the fine print! :-) OTOH, it's a darned good idea. It's a pretty simple release and I'm sure it's far from bulletproof, legally speaking. The funny thing is this guy has no intention of ever selling his photographs -- he's retired and living off a seven-figure pile of

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan request

2001-05-21 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 5/20/2001 6:16:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can the whole directory be moved to another drive? Yes. Is the code specifically aware of the c: drive? No. Regards, Ed Hamrick

RE: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Laurie Solomon
I wonder if asking for a release could create additional problems; Yes; but you could say that the additional problems are the cost of doing the business of street photography. There is no free lunch. once someone has refused to sign you have an explicit lack of consent for the photograph to

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding

2001-05-21 Thread Tony Sleep
On Sat, 19 May 2001 16:16:16 -0400 Johnny Deadman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Tone to me is the look of a correctly exposed non t-grain bw 4x5 negative developed using a compensating developer and printed on unglazed glossy FB paper. Quite what that has to do with chroma and hue angle

Re: filmscanners: OT: ISP's Emoticons

2001-05-21 Thread Tony Sleep
On Fri, 18 May 2001 18:26:08 -0400 (EDT) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I've also been having problems, and I think some others may have, too. Is it my paranoia showing through, or is something going wrong with the Internet? It's prone to intermittent little local difficulties,

Re: filmscanners: OT: photographing on the street

2001-05-21 Thread Bill Ross
I have a problem with giving out money for photographing people on the streets. (a) your relationship is contractual rather than a voluntary arrangement but much more importantly (b) I'd rather people wanted to be photographed without payment entering into it. I

Re: filmscanners: It's OptiCal I meant

2001-05-21 Thread Jim Snyder
on 5/21/01 12:16 PM, PAUL GRAHAM at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, Realised my past posting was confusing: Does anyone have OptiCal (the ColorVision programme) for the monitor spyder for PC that they can send me? I have found that my programme is corrupted, and simply can't find my

Re: filmscanners: which space?

2001-05-21 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
We don't disagree - I work primarily in LAB and CMYK myself, for both web and print, but then convert to RGB for final contrast adjustments and to send to the printer. I use Corel PhotoPaint though and an HP printer so I can't comment on Photoshop configuration. I have had good success in

RE: filmscanners: It's OptiCal I meant

2001-05-21 Thread Tim Atherton
It's all inhere somewhere ftp://ftp.colorcal.com/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Snyder Sent: May 21, 2001 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: It's OptiCal I meant on 5/21/01 12:16 PM, PAUL GRAHAM at

RE: filmscanners: It's OptiCal I meant

2001-05-21 Thread Tim Atherton
Jim, You can get it off the website - can find the url right now. If you need it I'll hunt it down Tim A -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Snyder Sent: May 21, 2001 6:53 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: It's