Same problem here with the epson list. My emails just don't get
through.
Robert
--- Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems?
All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it
today.
Code red strikes?
It probably will not install the Nikon software on WIN98 it will be looking
for SE.
Eddie
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 2:52 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Operating System for Nikon IV
I expect to
Arthur, thank you for the excellent advice, but I'm not quite sure how to
make different exposures using Vuescan. Adjusting the Gamma didn't seem to
affect the blown out white; changing the white point to 0 didn't seem to
make a difference either. Am I missing something? How do I bring down
I have the exact same problem with Supra 400 - red and green speckles in
the shadows. Like you, I can't get them to disappear without blowing
away a lot of shadow detail. I don't know if a drum scan would solve
this or not - I've seen the same problem on both my SS4000 and my new
Yes W98 is totally fine here (I worried about this for a day or so, before
deciding to risk it). Nikon Scan 3.0 crashed 2 or 3 times over a few days.
3.1 has crashed about twice in 5 weeks or however long it is that I've been
round here.
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I have a neg of a bride in window light and her gown is burned out. Any
suggestions for bringing in detail in the scan process?
STEPHENJENNINGS
P h o t o g r a p h e r
Cambridge, MA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sure Do.
Work fine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 9:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Operating System for Nikon IV
I expect to spring for the
What in particular are you looking for re using the Nikon IV with Win98? I
have heard of no problems on this list or any other - they work fine
together - and I currently use the Nikon LS-30 with Win98SE with no
problems.
As to Win98SE v. Win98B - move on up. Win98SE has no more and no less
On Thu, 02 Aug 2001 13:16:29 -0400 Stephen Jennings
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have a neg of a bride in window light and her gown is burned out. Any
suggestions for bringing in detail in the scan process?
Assuming there is detail on the film ;) one way is to scan in 16bits,
adjusting
In a message dated 8/2/2001 3:09:26 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Also IMO it's going to become the Tri-X of slide films. Higher praise than
that I cannot give.
Woo Hoo!! I'm in
Ed
Hi Julie,
I have an Athlon 1Ghz with 512mb of memory and it performs very
well. A very interesting comparison of PC's is at this address
http://jazzdiver.com/photoshop/index.htm
Go to the Photoshop 6 performance comparison section.Should help you decide
( my results are down the
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 23:04:10 -0500 frankmazz ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
The Agfa Arcus 1200 is my first serious scanner. I'm doing bw and color
negs; both 4x5 and 35mm. I love it. I never see the model discussed here
so I wonder if I've got an unknown jewel or terrible taste (like a whale
From: Tomasz Zakrzewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: problem with monitor
Date: Thursday, 2 August 2001 08:56
Electronic devices are hopeless. Every month some electronic devices in my
household refuse to work properly.
This week: a monitor.
This problem
If anyone else is on the scan@leben list... are you having problems?
All my messages to it bounced yesterday and I got no mail from it today.
Code red strikes?
Art
I had a similar problem with an epson-inkjet list message, so I'm
afraid its somehow related to Mitchell Leben's server(s).
I think your problem is banding. It's very common in the lower range
scanners. I've a feeling there's not much you can do except pay more money
for a dedicated tranny scanner. Thats my assuption. Here from the others
first!!!
Regards Anthony
At 21:49 02-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
I saw benchmarks of a 1.3GHz Athlon outperforming a 1.7GHz P4 in
Photoshop... Wish I knew where they were now.
Possibly here:
Choosing the Best Platform for Adobe Photoshop
http://www.xbitlabs.com/cpu/photoshop-platform/
That wasn't it, but
16 matches
Mail list logo
