Congratulations Rob! It is cool.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
| I just wanted to share my excitement about getting the cover
Alan wrote:
JASC hasn't taken compression/decompression of 48-bit images
seriously because PSP can't work with them. If you do load a
48-bit image you can only save it as 24-bit.
Oh, sure. I was just pointing out that ACDSee wasn't the only program which
had problems with the Vuescan
In a message dated 9/4/2001 7:59:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VueScan already is beginning to support OS X, but I assume
that it will need a Polaroid driver to work from.
VueScan works fine on OS X with the SprintScan 4000
without any Polaroid drivers installed.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 9/4/2001 7:59:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VueScan already is beginning to support OS X, but I assume
that it will need a Polaroid driver to work from.
VueScan works fine on OS X with the SprintScan 4000
without any Polaroid drivers installed.
Regards,
Ed
If you have any preferences for the types of keyboard
shortcuts you'd like me to add to VueScan, please send
me e-mail with your suggestions (please don't clog up
this mailing list with these suggestions though).
I need to decide how to use the function keys, control-letter,
Alt-letter, and
One of the things that amazes me about Ed's work is
that, technically speaking, it is Vuescan that's
included in the Vueprint license.
Pat
--- Alan Tyson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As a *viewer*, Ed Hamrick's *Vueprint* is pretty
well
unbeatable, and it's included in the Vuescan
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality unacceptable. I was thinking
that I would have to bite the bullet and get drum scans
made, but it occurs to me that if aliasing is an
interference pattern
O.T., but darn interesting:
Maybe I'm dreaming, but if I heard what I think I did, the whole
computer industry is about to start a new ball game.
I believe I heard that Motorola just developed a CPU that runs at, not 7
gigahertz but SEVENTY gigahertz.
If that's true, and it can be produced in
Title: Re:Dust removal software/ Question forEd Hamrick
This is to Ed Hamrick
I have not been satisfied with the softening of images on my Nikon Super coolscan 4000 when
using Digital ICE for dust removal. I received the following response to a post I placed on the Photo.net Forum. What do you
I believe I heard that Motorola just developed a CPU that runs at, not 7
gigahertz but SEVENTY gigahertz.
Just think, you can browse the Internet and get your eMail (at 56k) with
your 70GHz CPU...
Congratulations!!!
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 10:51 PM
Subject: filmscanners: OT (a bit): Publishing pictures :)
I just wanted to share my excitement about getting the cover photo and two
I have had great results scanning Sura 400 with both a
Canon 2710 and Minolta Scan Elite. I really like this
as my general purpose film, in fact.
Pat
--- John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need
to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get
Motorola has worked out how to get gallium arsenide (ultra high performance
but damned expensive) to co-exist with standard silicon tech. I saw this
on:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/21450.html
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem with Supra 400. Stopped
using it even though it is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
Tom
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality
the Motorola press release is here. It doesn't say anything about 70 GHz
chips!
http://www.corporate-ir.net/ireye/ir_site.zhtml?ticker=MOTscript=410layout
=-6item_id=203874
basically I think they have managed to bond a gallium arsenide layer to a
silicon substrate in a way that allows both
I haven't found any numbers for CPU speed, but the following story (which
requires a free registration) says that Motorola has come up with a way to
combine GaAs with silicon to produce significantly faster circuits. (It has
been said that Gallium Arsenide--GaAs--is the semiconductor material
I have the Nikon LS-30 (2700spi) and my results have been fair though not
poor.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: filmscanners: supra 400
| I have a number of
Exciting stuff Rob! I love seeing your airplane pictures. Keep up the good
work. I probably won't see the magazine over here, but you should share a
link where we can see them on-line. Congratulations.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
The publisher didn't whine about receiving a photo scanned by yourself? I was
under the impression (although it is perhaps a myth nowadays) that a fair number
of publishers want to do their own scans (and I have been asked for a
transparency on at least one occasion, which I refused).
A
Don't quote me, but I recall reading somewhere that by 'scanner optimized'
Kodak meant that it is better protected against processing lab scratches.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tom Scales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:49 PM
Subject:
I want to know when they are going to get those DNA based computers they've
been working on up and running? (seriously...)
tim a
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Deadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filmscanners [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 1:13 PM
Subject: Re:
Good luck getting a DNA computer to run WinNT4 or
SCSI.
--- Tim Atherton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to know when they are going to get those DNA
based computers they've
been working on up and running? (seriously...)
tim a
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Deadman [EMAIL
2001-09-05-15:38:34 Stan McQueen:
(It has been said that Gallium Arsenide--GaAs--is the semiconductor
material of the future, and it always will be.)
Yep, I remember when the transition in camera meters from CdS to
so-called silicon blue cells was getting well underway, pundits
opined that we
O.T., but darn interesting:
Maybe I'm dreaming, but if I heard what I think I did, the whole
computer industry is about to start a new ball game.
I believe I heard that Motorola just developed a CPU that runs at, not 7
gigahertz but SEVENTY gigahertz.
If that's true, and it can be produced in
I just scanned the Stouffer and a Max400 dupe of the Stouffer. There was a
light leak in my homemade film holder so the results won't be 100%
accurate. If I could only find my film duplicator.
Direct BW scans of the Stouffer target were made in BW negative mode.
Note that VS kept changing to
I think something is a little overclocked. BG The speed of
light is 2.99 times 10E10 (that is 3 followed by 10 zeros) cm
per second. One of the outcomes of Einstein's theory of
relativity is nothing can travel faster then the speed of light.
I don't know the size of the actual chip, but if
Jees Ed you let the secret out. That is precisly why the scanner
bands.Polaroid scanners use a tri linear array and CCD element is normalised
to take thes element to element differences out. They are just not doing a
very good job of it. Tricky but not rocket science.
David
-Original
If I'm not mistaken, Nikon has been using GaAs if photo meters for some
time now...
(Or at least did...)
Art
Jeff Moore wrote:
2001-09-05-15:38:34 Stan McQueen:
(It has been said that Gallium Arsenide--GaAs--is the semiconductor
material of the future, and it always will be.)
Yep, I
Pat Perez wrote:
Good luck getting a DNA computer to run WinNT4 or
SCSI.
They have helped to damage my DNA (Sleepless nights, poor nutrition,
emotional breakdowns, etc,... ;-))
Art
Actually this DNA stuff is slow compared to the theoretical quantum
mechanical systems they are working on. I think Douglas Adams (RIP) of
Hitchhiker's Guide fame, wasn't far off with his improbability drive ;-)
Art
Tim Atherton wrote:
I want to know when they are going to get those DNA
Martin wrote:
I have not been satisfied with the softening of images
on my Nikon Super coolscan 4000 when using Digital ICE
for dust removal. I received the following response to
a post I placed on the Photo.net Forum. What do you
think. Would I get less softening using Vuescan than
Ed
I just downloaded a trial version. Am hoping it will help to get less
softening of images when using ICE. I am running a Nikon LS 4000, using a
400 Mhz Mac G4 through a Firewire connection. My download consisted of
71.sit and 712.sit, which opened as Vuescan folders Vuescan and Vuescan 2.
Tom wrote:
Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem
with Supra 400. Stopped using it even though it
is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality
Martin wrote:
I just downloaded a trial version. Am hoping it will help
to get less softening of images when using ICE. I am
running a Nikon LS 4000, using a 400 Mhz Mac G4 through a
Firewire connection.
Others can correct me if I'm wrong here, but I think Ed has stated that
the firewire
I am using a Canon FS2710 invoked from PS 6.0.1 via the twain driver. My
question is: Should I modify the image using levels, curves, etc. at the
time of the scan or simply perform the scan, save the image as a .psd file,
then make any modifications later?
Thanks...
Tom Maugham
Hello,
What opinions do you have on the Nikon LS40 IVED Scanner? It uses a USB
connection. This scanner is in my price range. Are there others that would
be of higher quality for the price? How does it compare to the LS 30?
Thanks,
Stephen
on 9/5/01 7:59 PM, Barbara Martin Greene at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed
I just downloaded a trial version. Am hoping it will help to get less
softening of images when using ICE. I am running a Nikon LS 4000, using a
400 Mhz Mac G4 through a Firewire connection. My download consisted of
Comparing NS3.1 with the Kodak print of the Max400 Stouffer dupe,
NS3.1 has
more dynamic range by at least two stops. The print compresses the
brightest 2 stops and the darkest step is compressed.
Mike Duncan
What does the scanning software have to do with the dynamic range of the
Gilbert Rob
Thanks for the information. Before long I'll get OS X 10.1 and then I'll be
able to try out Vuescan.
Martin
From: Gilbert Plantinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 22:18:57 -0400
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: New to
There is no set answer one way or the other to this question - it's whatever
works best for you.
I use VueScan myself rather than NikonScan for my LS-30. I prefer to
capture the entire tonal range by setting white and black points where
appropriate or even outside that to be certain I capture
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Duncan
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan VS Negative dynamic range
Comparing NS3.1 with the Kodak print of the Max400
Art,
Each element is normalized so they all deliver the same data. Not rocket
science but tricky. We just do a better job at it.
David
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 5:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re:
42 matches
Mail list logo
