[filmscanners] RE: LS 4000 Green Cast

2002-01-10 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Do a very low resolution RAW scan. Do this by choosing NEF from the File Format drop down list after you've hit the Scan button. Make sure to set the resolution to something like 90dpi (actually that makes a tiny 39K image, maybe that's too small...). Post it to a webby somewhere so we can

[filmscanners] RE: LS4000 vs IV ED

2002-01-10 Thread Alex Zabrovsky
No jawed, I must be miss your posting. Would you please to remind me the links ? Was the IV ED sued to that test ? Regards, Alex Z -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jawed Ashraf Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 3:00 AM To: [EMAIL

[filmscanners] RE: Clipping

2002-01-10 Thread Mike Bloor
At 17:44 08/01/02 +, Jawed wrote: Some software, unfortunately, makes it hard to tell where the histogram ends, if there are very few pixels of a given tonal value. Photoshop 6 is pretty clear. Paint Shop Pro 6 isn't at all. Is PSP7 better? What if the base line of the histogram were a

[filmscanners] Re: Clipping

2002-01-10 Thread Arthur Entlich
Jawed Ashraf wrote: London, UK. I was intrigued to discover years ago that houses aren't build from brick in Canada, they fall apart because of the dry climate. Don't tell that to anyone living on the West (Wet) Coast... What do you think those trees with 30 foot around trunks grow

[filmscanners] Re: Clipping

2002-01-10 Thread
In a message dated 1/10/2002 6:15:24 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What if the base line of the histogram were a different colour for the range where there were pixels, even if there were not enough pixels to show on the histogram plot ? That way it would be easy to set black and white

[filmscanners] RE: Clipping

2002-01-10 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Yeah, I know. Vancouver's supposed to have a British-ish climate, LOL... I was there in summer, not for long enough to be able to judge... Jawed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: 10 January 2002 11:44 To: [EMAIL

[filmscanners] RE: VueScan Suggestions Needed

2002-01-10 Thread Jawed Ashraf
I'll try to combine these suggestions and summarize them to the list. Could people e-mail these suggestions to me directly to keep from cluttering up this mailing list? Ah, well, if we can chat about hifi here, I can't see that enhancement suggestions would be too off-topic. And

[filmscanners] Re: VueScan Suggestions Needed

2002-01-10 Thread John Matturri
I second this idea, if it is practical. Jawed Ashraf wrote: The Photoshop approach is addictive: up/down arrow increments by one unit shift held down at the same time increments by 10 units. mouse-wheel up down is synonymous with up/down arrow (sorry Mac users, you're *really* missing out

[filmscanners] Re: LS4000 vs IV ED

2002-01-10 Thread Arthur Entlich
I took a look at the website and the Astia samples. You need to fix the titles under the samples, they are either missing (in the cropped images once they appear) or in the case of the full images, the top two are listed as Vuescan Single pass, and the bottom one as Nikoscan. I suspect the

[filmscanners] RE: LS4000 vs IV ED

2002-01-10 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Sounds like you whizzed through too quickly. The top image uses *SLIDE* scanning in Vuescan, the middle image uses *IMAGE* scanning in Vuescan and the bottom one is Nikon Scan. For the crops the mouse pointer is captioned. Plus, they are described in more detail in the How the results are

[filmscanners] RE: Clipping

2002-01-10 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Preben if I took your attitude every time printing came up, I'd have been thrown off this list ages ago. Jawed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Preben S. Kristensen Sent: 09 January 2002 11:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: