[filmscanners] Re: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-10 Thread Arthur Entlich
Hi Andre, I am NOT the list owner here, and the following views are my own. I have been with this list since its earliest beginnings, however, and am a fairly active poster. Having clarified that, here are my views: Welcome to free speech. I know of no newsgroups or lists that do not have off

[filmscanners] RE: Bands while using Vuescan

2002-08-10 Thread Nagaraj, Ramesh
I too was wandering what is this Linear scan is. Its good idea to scan with minolta s/w and process with vuescan. I get the control and also I will get to know whether Vuscan's post-scan processing is causing bands. I will try. Thanks Ramesh -Original Message- From: [mailto:[EMAIL

[filmscanners] Re: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest forFri 9 Aug,2002-Firnware

2002-08-10 Thread Arthur Entlich
Firmware is the programming which is held within the peripheral. It is held in one or more flash memory or other types of chips. Usually, firmware contains information which is necessary for the basic functions of the peripheral or information that the computer or OS needs to know about the

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening

2002-08-10 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Maris writes: Brian said the file size was reduced, so there was apparently resampliing (downsampling). Or the amount of information in the file did not increase. In any case, if one proceeds as he describes (changing the dimension of the image to 11 inches in Photoshop), the results are as

[filmscanners] Re: Help with purchasing decision?

2002-08-10 Thread Arthur Entlich
Hi Michael, I think you will find the Microtek offerings very similar to Polaroid's. If Polaroid was on more solid footing, I would suggest it as a better option, because, up until recently at least, they provided better client support (in North America), and the software package (Insight) is a

[filmscanners] Re: PS sharpening

2002-08-10 Thread Maris V. Lidaka Sr.
I tried it. Leaving the Resample box checked does result in no change the ppi Resolution. Unchecking the Resample box does result in a change in Resolution. Maris - Original Message - From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 7:03 PM

[filmscanners] RE: IV ED dynamic range... DYNAMIC RANGE!

2002-08-10 Thread Austin Franklin
Basically, what it comes down to is that if you want more signal and less noise, then contribute signal, not noise. If you are here to watch and listen you are certainly welcome, but you cannot dictate policy or content. Hi Arthur, I agree with what you said, and I'm sure you know

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan problem

2002-08-10 Thread John Matturri
I completely missed your kind offer - thanks. And thanks to everyone who responded. I got zero response form comp.periphs.scanners, and surprisingly, no response from an e-mail to Ed. But I'm sure he's swamped. So you guys are it! Ed's replies tend not to be immediate so you may still

[filmscanners] RE: PS sharpening

2002-08-10 Thread Laurie Solomon
Maris, As this post came through, I am unsure which is your statement and which is the quoted statement you are responding to; but I assume it is the second one. I agree entirely with it, although I typically tend to refer to resolution in this situation as effective resolution rather than as