Re: contact sheets? one possible solution

2000-10-24 Thread jimhayes
In addition to $$ you might want to consider film scanners that take "naked" strips as opposed to carriers, if time is a factor. Personally I just load up 3 strips in old Polaroid 35 holders, 3 at a time and plop them into an opaque sheet of gatorfoam , plastic, whatever. The template positions

Re: Epson output dpi was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-07 Thread jimhayes
About a month ago I touched off a thread on the piezo list about banding going away at certain dpi with piezo driver. But I was mistaken, it was extremely sensitive to kind of paper, getting a good printer, image file(scan) quality, and getting absolutely anal about nozzle and alignment checks. I

Re: Epson output dpi was Re: filmscanners: 4000 dpi question

2000-11-08 Thread jimhayes
the picture in the Epson manual is grossly deleinated banding. Now remember Im using the piezo driver which prints differently than epson driver. Much more fine lines. I get different types of banding but all much more subtle than in that picture. Yet still quite visible with naked eye at a foot

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan support of Umax Astra 3400?

2000-12-09 Thread jimhayes
Vuescan rather than the software package that comes with the Umax Astra, so long as your software supports the scanner. Advice? Robert DeCandido -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners:Umax Vista s-12 scanner buggy in pshop 6

2000-12-09 Thread jimhayes
d at least under it's native driver. I think it's time to save up for the Epson 1600... -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners:Kodak Supra vs Tmax for bW output?

2000-12-09 Thread jimhayes
Opinions on using Kodak Supra 100, 400 color neg instead of Tmax 100, Tmax 400CN for SS4000 scanning into pshop for eventual bw output? Anti-scratch coating,Grain, sharpness (after color supra run thru channel mixer in pshop) vs Tmax? -- Jim Hayes

Re: filmscanners: removing dust from SS4000

2001-01-21 Thread jimhayes
. Yes, but be terribly careful to keep the can upright and vertical. ... -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?

2001-01-24 Thread jimhayes
00 already does what you want, why change it? I agree. Most people don't need 4000dpi. There seems to be very little difference between 2700dpi and 4000dpi for 8"x10" printing. -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.6.1 Available

2001-02-02 Thread jimhayes
as well as remove dust spots. * Modified non-infrared cleaning to remove progressively larger dust spots and progressively reduce film grain. -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

filmscanners: Vuescan w/ Illford bw

2001-02-12 Thread jimhayes
Recomended media type setting for Delta 400 and 100 setting? -- Jim Hayes

Re: filmscanners: storage

2001-02-14 Thread jimhayes
es at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: storage

2001-02-15 Thread jimhayes
itsui golds. Anyone know what else Phillips makes besides TV's and CDR's that would be reliable? Maybe I should replace my stereo?g Arthur Entlich wrote: jimhayes wrote: Yamaha. Don't get a Phillips or an HP. I just got a settlement from a class action suit against Phillips CD recorder. S

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - Ed Hamrick - Thanks

2001-03-24 Thread jimhayes
I don't understand either the condemnation or the worship. All I know is, in the dark days of the Polaroid SS 4000, when Insight 3.5 was all that was available in the US, scanning bw was almost hopeless. But it was the only 4000 ppi scanner in that price range. Vuescan 5.x made it possible for me

Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning

2001-03-24 Thread jimhayes
When I read the Kodak specs carefully, the anti-scratch coating is mentioned for the 400 speed Supra, but not for the 100 speed Supra. Also, I was told the 100 speed has just been renamed from Portra. The impression I got from Kodak was that the 400 and 800 speed were new formulations. Edwin

Re: filmscanners: NikonLS-3510AF

2001-03-26 Thread jimhayes
The LS-3510AF had MANY more problems than steppers. Trust me. I had painful experience with one for years. And my machine worked for it's specs. Examples: dynamic range (never published, but told to me by Nikon after warranty period) only about 2.4; Windows version software had bug which

filmscanners: Vuescan 7.0.8 fast!

2001-03-30 Thread jimhayes
Yikes! I sent Ed my log file from running Vuescan 7.07 and getting nasty hangs on my SS 4000 in Windows98SE- it froze everything up, so I had to do power off/on reboots. Within 12 hours he sent me a test file, and about two hours after I e-mailed him telling him it now works, he releases it (

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 7.0.8 fast!

2001-03-30 Thread jimhayes
out, so the log file gets lost. I can't even get to the end of preview now without a total freeze. :-( -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan 7.0.8 hang!

2001-03-31 Thread jimhayes
a log file- it freezes the machine before I can bail out, so the log file gets lost. I can't even get to the end of preview now without a total freeze. :-( -- Jim Hayes Pixelography: The marriage of silicon and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: You have several hundred thousand transparencies to scan...

2001-04-08 Thread jimhayes
I hate to recomend the old Nikon LS3510AF to anybody, because it's really a terrible scanner from the dark days. But you can live with some reduced image quality. They used to cost about $5000, but you can get them in good shape for under $300 US now. Shows how worthless they are in these

Re: filmscanners: leveling scanners

2001-06-21 Thread jimhayes
and silver. Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

filmscanners: SS 4000 cleaning of dust (David?)

2001-09-03 Thread jimhayes
/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?

2001-09-19 Thread jimhayes
mind spotting away for two hours or more, as long as I can get up every half hour to take a quick screaming break. Hopes that helps. -- Jim Hayes Digital Surrealism Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?

2001-09-22 Thread jimhayes
Karl Schulmeisters wrote: and compressed air from a rather healthy air compressor (not damaging neg, however), What PSI are you using as your threshold? Yikes, The control knob for it is near my foot when I work well under a table, and somehow it got cranked up(?) to 60 psi!! I use a

Re: filmscanners: Dust in Sprintscan 4000?

2001-09-22 Thread jimhayes
, Silverfast, and Vuescan, all having terrible documentation, takes a good bit of time. I am now getting very good scans with better color than I got with the Nikon, albeit spending at least one half an hour per scan to remove the spots. Martin From: jimhayes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Of course, waying

Re: filmscanners: Air cleaner

2001-11-16 Thread jimhayes
: A few days ago I came across a reference to an electronic air cleaner. I thought it was in a post to this list, but now I can't find it. I'd appreciate a pointer to the relevant website. Thanks salutations, David L -- Jim Hayes Digital Surrealism Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-17 Thread jimhayes
correction: that was version7.2.8 that I last tried it and it worked. jimhayes wrote: On my SS 4000, Win98SE version 7.33 worked fine. Using version 7.35 with bw Tmax film the following happens: 1) Scan takes 15 minutes instead of about 3 minutes. 2) The image opens up in photoshop upside

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan 'bugs'

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
Mark T. wrote: Can't help with your problem, but I have to make comment (as president of I too am appreciative of Ed, since an early version 5 worked much better than Insight 3.5 on the SS 4000 for Bw about October of 1999. 4) I see from the viewscan site, he no longer answers e-mails

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
it, slight correction there. Thanks, Regards, Ed Hamrick -- Jim Hayes Digital Surrealism Images at http://www.jymis.com/~jimhayes

Re: filmscanners:Vuescan bugs isolated

2001-12-18 Thread jimhayes
Ed, I was just testing this very thing. I tried changing three things: 1) focus from always to on preview; 2) Changing both monitor and file space from Apple RGB to Adobe RGB and back (remember I have a bw image); and 3) checking/unchecking the release memory box. I normally leave this