Rick wrote:
Just started noticing this- but things that were posted a week ago seem to
be showing up on list again... server problems?
Rick
I've noticed the same thing, and just chastized my ISP. Oh, well, they
deserved it anyway. ;-)
(Also mentioned it to Tony, off-list, but he's been awfully
Hey Tony-
Just started noticing this- but things that were posted a week ago seem to
be showing up on list again... server problems?
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Berk
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:10 AM
To: [EMAIL
the nikon, and the extra resolution is nothing to
sneeze at.
IMHO,
david
From: "Rick Berk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 07:41:16 -0500 To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Kodak RFS 3600
Ok..here goes... just didn't want to bo
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 18:15:54 +
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS 3600
I would be glad to send some samples to you directly, but off list.
Feel free to drop me a note.
Dave
Thanks for the review.
Have you (or anyone else) batch scanned anything yet? I'm wondering how
long it takes to chew through a roll, whether the 37th frame will make
it choke, and how much babysitting you need to do.
Thanks.
tv
(Hi Jules.)
David Sirola wrote:
Here's my take on the Kodak
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 11:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Kodak RFS 3600
Thanks for the review.
Have you (or anyone else) batch scanned anything yet? I'm wondering how
long it takes to chew through a roll, whether
This month's Shutterbug has a review of the 3600. Reviewer's main complaint
is with the software, including very small preview screens.
Keith
Couldn't you just post to the list? I'd like to hear too...
tv
Rick Berk wrote:
Would the person who e-mailed me for my opinion of the Kodak RFS 3600 please
e-mail me off list? I apologize- I had a system crash last week and lost
everything, including your message asking about it.
I haven't owned of used one. You are right about the specs. The
complaints (and there have been quite a few) is that the software is
very problematic. I think Kodak just slashed the price on it, as well.
The other thing about Kodak, as a company, that I'd watch out for is this:
They tend
: Kodak RFS 3600
One of the biggest problems will be if you need support. A friend of mine
had to
call them several times for his RFS 3600 and they really did not supply much
help.
Part of the problem may have been due to the ME Windows he was running. He
had
nothing but problems. Also, the scans were
Dave,
I bought one after I learned on the original Scan Dual. I think that it is
a great scanner. The software seems to be a little buggy at times, but it
works for me. A lot of features, and the ability to scan a whole roll at
one time. I have not had to make any color corrections in PS
on 1/8/01 10:53 PM, Berry Ives at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The price is a lot higher for the RFS 3600, with no ICE, multiscanning, or
12-bit output. But I assume the software is new. And mostly good comments
on this listserve to date.
The software that drives the 3600 is truly awful! It's
on 1/9/01 5:59 AM PST, Andrew Rodney wrote:
The software that drives the 3600 is truly awful! It's beta software
disguised as a working product (it isn't, even with the .1 dot release).
There will be a review of the scanner going up in the next day or so at
www.imaginginsider.com. In the
on 1/9/01 1:16 PM, David Corwin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you think PEI gave it a COOL2 Award (Best Imaging Products of 2000)
for "best" 35mm filmscanner?
I can't possibly imagine. They must have been blind or something. FWIW, I
used to be the technical editor but stopped writing for
Paul, I am curious what kind of computer are you using mac or PC, and
PC
what cards are installed.
Adaptec 2940AU
If PC, which operating system are you using? I
Win 98se
am curious because I have had no lockups at all, and you are the third
person I've read about that has complained of
Paul, I am curious what kind of computer are you using mac or PC, and
what cards are installed. If PC, which operating system are you using? I
am curious because I have had no lockups at all, and you are the third
person I've read about that has complained of lockups. I'm curious if
there is not
Hi Dan,
I am replying off list because I don't think my comparisons of the 3600 and
the ss4000 is scientific by any means. I returned the 3600 for two reasons.
The first is that it sounded like something was grinding inside the unit
whenever it was in use. This may have been the reason I was
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Trozzo
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2000 3:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner
Hi Dan,
I am replying off list because I don't think my comparisons of the 3600 and
the ss4000 is scientific by any
Dan, would you mind telling me where you
purchased your 3600?
Still no sign of it showing up in Canada.
Paul
http://okphoto.webjump.com
P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876
BH Photo in New York city
Dan
OK Photo wrote:
Dan, would you mind telling me where you
purchased your 3600?
Still no sign of it showing up in Canada.
Paul
http://okphoto.webjump.com
P:250-498-2800 F:250-498-6876
Raymond,
I spent the first day of scanning using the scanner without reading the
manual. So before you take these observations as gospel, I think
I should read manual and experiment some more. Please note that my
previous experience with film scanners is limited to the SS4000. But
preliminary
Thanks much for the info you have given us on the rfs 3600. It's a big help.
Wondering if you tried to scan black white negs. and if so how were the
results?
Dave Small
Sorry, but I don't have any BW negatives to test, but I do have a roll
of that Kodak BW film that uses the C-41 process. I will shoot it when
I have a chance and try it.
One thing I forgot to mention in the previous post is that so far every
frame I have scanned needed very little if any
"Mo" is "Mega-octets," French for "Megabytes!"
Just came back from N.Y. photoexpo. Saw the new Kodak rfs 3600 scanner. Looks
good but wondering if anyone has done a review on it yet, or has any personal
experience with it .
We have just ordered a 3600. I'm not sure what product
availability is in the US but in Canada they are not available
Please do let me know. I believe they are available in the U.S.
Dave
It's not shipping
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 11:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: kodak rfs 3600 scanner
Just came back from N.Y. photoexpo. Saw the new Kodak rfs 3600 scanner.
Looks
good but
27 matches
Mail list logo
