in unanticipated consequences when there is some
other color present in the original subject.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 2:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
Mike wrote:
All this discussion of skin tones, etc., only underlines my contention
that the best way to get calibrated for color and stay there is to get a
shot of a black/18%gray/white card under the same light conditions your
subject and set your points to that
Absolutely, 100-per-cent!!!
Mike: Thanks for the color setting information for the skin tones,
especially
as it related to the print.
Actually, it reminded me of a print (pre digital) that nearly drove me
crazy. I had photographed by roommates girl friend against an off white
wall. When I corrected the color so that
why not handle it the way you did when shooting black and white film? why not
revert to filters to lighten the skin tones, rather than trying to correct
them later with photoshop?
Sorry
to jump into the middle of a conversation ( which might mean that my reading of
your remarks is out of context and my response may therefore
inappropriate). Since I believe this has been a discussion of color images
and not black and white ones, I would respond that I do not know of
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
My understanding is that there is a degradation or change returning from
CMYK to RGB but this is from what I
On Sat, 31 Mar 2001 08:47:54 -0600 Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Concerning the CMYK values for skintones, your guidelines appear to be more
or less correct. I have found Dan Margulis's guidelines to be a bit better
and empirically more accurate. He maintains that, for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert E. Wright) wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2001 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
Another problem that comes to mind is that scanners
Maris and Mikael
These CMYK values for facial skin tones are very useful.
I have been struggling with some of my first scans trying to get the
skin tones to look right. Of course, in these photographs there aren't
even any good areas of black or white to help set those points.
By adjusting
01, 2001 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
| Maris and Mikael
|
| These CMYK values for facial skin tones are very useful.
|
| I have been struggling with some of my first scans trying to get the
| skin tones to look right. Of course, in these photographs there aren't
Maris
Yes, you posted it I downloaded it, I just haven't had a chance to look
though it yet. The fact that I could take those basic numbers and make
an immediate and notable improvement to my scans is satisfying.
--
Jim
"Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." wrote:
I may have recommended it before, but
the duplicated CMYK?
2.Were the numbers the same or different between these two RGBs?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Robert E. Wright" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2001 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: negative and skin tones
|
|
VueScan is very interesting and useful to the subscribers on this group, and
the program is somewhat opaque resulting in the many discussions of what
appear to be insignificant details and changes in the different versions. I
would venture to say that Vuescan is the primary scanning program used
Mike: Thanks for the color setting information for the skin tones, especially
as it related to the print.
For your other comment. You hear about VS because many of us use it. Since I am
relatively new to scanning, what is the relevance of the scanning software to
the color balance of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
