Well if you _really_ want things to be on topic, think of the Timo-type linear gamma
theories in terms of the last paragraph quoted below. Myself, I try to stay away from
these OT threads but sometimes the spirit is willing but the pedant is weak.
John M.
James Klebau wrote:
Uh, what kind of
Clark Guy wrote:
Science is the idea that soneone makes a claim and
others strive to independently verify the claim.
Given the impossibility of confirmation (there is always an alternate
explanation) attempts at disconfirmation are usually the way to go. But even
once that is done, it is
Uh, what kind of scanners are you talking about? Is this a philosophy
chat room?
John Matturri wrote:
Clark Guy wrote:
Science is the idea that soneone makes a claim and
others strive to independently verify the claim.
Given the impossibility of confirmation (there is always an
James,
It tends to get this way once a week or so. Especially on the
weekends.
It is truly amazing the diverse group that hangs out here. You
bet.
No beer for me tonight though, thanks anyway.
Guy
Friday, November 24, 2000, 7:43:26 PM, you wrote:
JK Uh,
Clark Guy wrote:
Hi, Art!
I wasn't going to get involved in this issue, but I vehemently disagree with
your assertion that
"Science is whatever the ruling scientist claim is true now. "
Out of respect for both the list owner and other members, those silent
as well as those whom
Hi, Art!
I wasn't going to get involved in this issue, but I vehemently disagree with
your assertion that
"Science is whatever the ruling scientist claim is true now. "
That's NOT science. Science is the idea that soneone makes a claim and
others strive to independently verify the claim.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clark Guy
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Science vs. religion (was RE: filmscanners: Re: Print dpi
comparison)
Hi, Art!
There
are also many
apparent
