Tony wrote--
Stuffing the 2x2's into filing sheet pockets will be easier than
engineering a
film holder...
Good point. I was thinking there'd be more film than 2x2 holders, but that
wouldn't have to be true. It would certainly be cheaper than printing
each-and-every neg.
Hope we've helped the
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 17:35:24 -0500 (EST) Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
"Which
film scanner would be best for 110 film?", something I haven't actually seen
addressed here, so far.
Point One, it would need to be a fairly hi-res scanner.
Anything more than ~2700ppi is likely to be
Bob wrote:
I think you must realize that the 110 format probably didn't
produce the best negative or transparency because it relied on a plastic
cartridge to hold the film flat and at the precise film plane.
That's certainly true for the inexpesive 110 cameras, but I recall that
Asahi (Pentax)
Ive scanned some 110 trannies for a family member ,otherwise Id have
said no !
I Drum scanned at 4000 dpi and we then printed via the epson to around
5x4 inches.
the results were acceptable inasmuch as they provided a memory of an
occasion,but award winners they were not .
Perhaps a better way
it relied on a plastic
cartridge to hold the film flat and at the precise film plane.
Bob Wright
- Original Message -
From: Michael Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: 110 film
Ive scanned some 110 trannies
On Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:14:17 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Recently I was digging through old photos and found some 110
negs (that were used in "pocket" cameras in the 70's). I've been
meaning to try scanning them in the neg holder of the LS30.
I think it will work but it
Excuse me for coming in late, but I think the original question was "Which
film scanner would be best for 110 film?", something I haven't actually seen
addressed here, so far.
Point One, it would need to be a fairly hi-res scanner.
Point Two, it would need a carrier specifically designed for
If I am not mistaken, 110 film is pretty close to 16mm film which is again
pretty close to a 35mm film strip cut in half. You might want to see if you can
get a strip of 2 frames into a 35 mm holder side by side. In fact you may be
able to get 4 frames into the same opening as a 35mm slide
Jolene wrote:
I have been quietly reading the list for a couple of weeks now, as
I am preparing to buy my very first filmscanner. Here is my
question. I have a big ol' box of negatives (I think they are 16mm
in size) from family pictures. I would really like a scanner that is
capable of
You may be able to get slidemounts in the appropriate size for
individual size. I used to be able to get paper mounts in every
imaginable size from Spirotone in NY, which no longer exists in any form
I believe. There may be another source. It is also possible that Wess
makes an appropriately
]
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 6:18 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: 110 film
You may be able to get slidemounts in the appropriate size for
individual size. I used to be able to get paper mounts in every
imaginable size from Spirotone in NY, which no longer exists in any form
I believe
Hello, experts!I have been quietly reading
the list for a couple of weeks now, as I am preparing to buy my very first
filmscanner. Here is my question. I have a big ol' box ofnegatives (I
think they are 16mm in size) from family pictures. I would really like a scanner
that is capable of
12 matches
Mail list logo
