"Jack Phipps" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you do a scan using the Nikon interface do you have the "CleanImage"
(Nikon's old name for Digital ICE) in the "Mode: On (Sharpen)" or "Mode:
On
(Normal)"? The mode Nikon calls "Mode: On (Normal)" actually blurs the
image
slightly. You should run in
Thanks for the examples, Henry.
I agree that Ed should separate the filters - I have a non-IR scanner, and
am not a user of Vuescan yet, but this function would probably tip me into
the camp.
But ONLY if it doesn't soften my image as much as your samples indicate..
Mark T.
At 06:02 PM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your samples
indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
Rob
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
If you look at the first example on my page you will see that it was scanned
with version
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your
samples indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at
higher settings, but it's hard to know. Only separating the
features would make it possible to tell.
Rob
One could go back and try dust removal
From: Bob Shomler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5 (or some release
before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was added to vuescan).
Again, I refer you to this page I set up that does just what you suggest:
Bob writes ...
But ONLY if [vuescan] doesn't soften my image as much as your
samples indicate..
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at
higher settings, but it's hard to know. Only separating the
features would make it possible to tell.
Rob
One could go
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular spots that
are dust / scratches. Shouldn't the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and sharp?
John M.
John Matturri writes ...
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal
soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular
spots that are dust / scratches. Shouldn't
the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and sharp?
-
From: John Matturri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 12:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the partic
"Bob Shomler" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5
(or some release before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was
added to vuescan).
I still have several versions prior to 6.6. I'll see if I can give it a go.
Rob
"John Matturri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Related: why in general does Ice-based dust removal soften the image.
The purpose of the IR channel is to identify the particular spots that
are dust / scratches. Shouldn't the software only affect those areas
leaving the rest of the image alone and
"Jack Phipps" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Digital ICE from Applied Science Fiction should not soften the image.
Jack, are you talking about the current version of ICE, or the version
implemented on the Nikon LS30, LS2000 and Minolta Scan Elite?
If you're talking about the new version we'll have to
When you do a scan using the Nikon interface do you have the "CleanImage"
(Nikon's old name for Digital ICE) in the "Mode: On (Sharpen)" or "Mode: On
(Normal)"? The mode Nikon calls "Mode: On (Normal)" actually blurs the image
slightly. You should run in "Mode: On (Sharpen)". This should solve
Has anyone that has a scanner with GEM and ROC compared their results with
Ed Hamrick's recently added features in Vuescan that reduce grain and
restore color? How do they compare?
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
Henry writes ...
Has anyone that has a scanner with GEM and ROC
compared their results with Ed Hamrick's recently
added features in Vuescan that reduce grain and
restore color? How do they compare?
I agree we need someone to make a ^direct^ comparison. However, I
was initially
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My 1st experience with Ed's "scrub" was
disappointing with respect to edges ... it wasn't like a "gaussian
blur", but more like a "median" filter.
I agree. It seems to me that the grain reduction does soften the image. I
showed that on a webpage that I sent to
17 matches
Mail list logo
