Does anyone have any idea why the list seems to periodically repeat posts?
:-7
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 10:42 AM
chapter from Professional Photoshop at
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/LABCorrection.pdf where he suggests this
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Lynn Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing a
suggests this
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Lynn Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi
| Grain aliasing and noise has been a regular topic on this list. It should
| be--Ma
"There probably isn't enough 'picture there' to make a picture, there," you
might say. You've heard it before, said it before, and so have I, more than
once. But the thing is, there *is* quite a bit of picture there, and the
Scanwit "sees" it. Getting it *out of there* and making it presentable
Bob wrote:
I get into this sometimes with theatre photos where a combination of
tungsten stage lighting and very high contrast from brightest area to dark
background almost guarantee underexposure in some dark areas like background
and in shadows on faces, arms and legs.
When these are
Grain aliasing and noise has been a regular topic on this list. It should
be--Mark, Rob, I and others have been talking at it hard enough. Without any
spectacular results, I could add. :-\
It's a pity that TIFFs can't be sent reasonably on the Net, because I just
ran up against one that makes
Photoshop at
http://www.ledet.com/margulis/LABCorrection.pdf where he suggests this
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Lynn Allen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 6:15 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Grain Aliasing at 2700pppi
| Grain aliasing and
