At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for photoediting as they
color/contrast shift when you move your head. This also means that
even if you don't move your head relative to the LCD, all the
corners will display the same image range with different
At 06:08 30-08-01 -0400, you wrote:
At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for photoediting as they
color/contrast shift when you move your head. This also means that even
if you don't move your head relative to the LCD, all the corners
will
I think this deserves to be addressed on list as an on topic subject. LCDs
have yet to equal the tube monitors for representing the full range of
colors in an image. They do offer superior sharpness in the higher end
models. How do some of the professionals on the list who have looked
personally
At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for photoediting as they
color/contrast shift when you move your head. This also means that even if
you don't move your head relative to the LCD, all the corners will display
the same image range with different
What method of colour management do you use?
The last time I tried Adobe Gamma on a laptop the screen went into 4 or 5
colour mode :-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...))
wrote:
At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT: LCD monitors for photo editing
What method of colour management do you use?
The last time I tried Adobe Gamma on a laptop the screen
Cary writes:
Why do you suppose Apple is moving away from CRT's?
Because flat-panel displays look a lot more attractive, and Apple is trying to
expand its markets. Most users do not require precise color and luminosity in a
display.
It's not because they want to risk ditching all
their
