In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Stuart wrote:
But,of course ,no-one would do so while looking through the viewfinder as
this would be extremely detrimental to ones eyesight and if the shutter
was released would it not burn the blind ??
I don't think this is true of SLR's, as the image is formed on
It looks like a polarizing effect to me. Personally I don't use polarizers
with wide angle lenses with lots of sky in the image because I don't like
the effect. It's probably an individual thing. Great picture otherwise.
Thanks! I guess I'm just a sucker for saturated colours. ;)
Rob
Apologies to those who are using the digest, because the attached picture
will appear as encoded ascii. A while back I was in touch with a guy from a
stock photo company and I sent a low res jpeg of a photo of mine, which he
claimed showed vignetting. Now to me, vignetting in the camera is
Rob, As you stated, the effect is fall-off due the nature of the polarizer I
used to do a lot of landscape work, never had a publisher reject any polarized
sky shots, but I also tried to cull the ones with too much drop off in the
sky... Maybe you ought to submit digital files where you've
The effect is not actually vignetting in a in a traditional photographic sense.
The effect of the polarizer is heavier on the left side. The sky and sea seem
darker on the right side due to the polarizer. I agree with you on the
vignetting from lenses. The other vignetting effect can be seen
Rob Geraghty writes ...
... Now to me, vignetting in the
camera is caused by a wide-angle lens "seeing" the
edges of a filter. ... But the effect I
believe he was attributing to vignetting is caused by a
polariser - the sky tends to be darker at the edge
of the photo, sometimes on one
At 07:35 31-01-01 -0800, you wrote:
If you had a wide
enough lens and pointed the camera in the direction of the sun, then
the effect would be circular (altho with respect to the sun, not the
lens).
shAf :o)
But,of course ,no-one would do so while looking through the viewfinder as
this
I don't know if technically it is vignetting, but I find it distracting and
therefore objectionable.
Sorry.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 7:33 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Vignetting?
=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Vignetting?
Apologies to those who are using the digest, because the attached picture
Stuart writes ...
At 07:35 31-01-01 -0800, you wrote:
If you had a wide
enough lens and pointed the camera in the direction of the
sun, then
the effect would be circular (altho with respect to the
sun, not the
lens).
shAf :o)
But,of course ,no-one would do so while
At 11:33 PM +1000 1/31/01, Rob Geraghty wrote:
Would anyone on the list call the variation in the sky in the attached jpeg
vignetting? I don't find the effect objectionable, but are publishers
really likely to?
No, I wouldn't call it vignetting, but it is a bit
distracting (but then
Gordon wrote:
The effect is not actually vignetting in a in a traditional
photographic sense.
Thanks. I didn't think it was.
The effect of the polarizer is heavier on the left side.
The sky and sea seem darker on the right side due to the
polarizer.
It all depends on the angle of the
Yes its vignetting, you can easily take it out with Photoshop. I'm curious, what
lens and camera did you use?..was it a lens with a T-adapter?
"Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would anyone on the list call the variation in the sky in the attached jpeg
vignetting? I don't find the
Harm wrote:
Yes its vignetting, you can easily take it out
with Photoshop.
OK, a couple of people have said it could be removed
with Photoshop but I haven't a clue how. Could someone
please enlighten me? Off list may be more appropriate.
I'm curious, what lens and camera did you use?..
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Apologies to those who are using the digest, because the attached picture
will appear as encoded ascii. A while back I was in touch with a guy from a
stock photo company and I sent a low res jpeg of a photo of mine, which he
claimed showed vignetting. Now to me,
15 matches
Mail list logo
