= Original Message From Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
Tom wrote:
Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem
with Supra 400. Stopped using it even though it
is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of.
Jawed Ashraf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the photographer in the breeze! I want to try Provia 400F to get the
same
sort of speed which hopefully less apparent grain.
Provia 400 (F? are there variants?) scans beautifully - no grain aliasing
in
shadows on the LS40 (my mate Joel's Provia 400 - he
Obviously the Provia films are slides and the Superia are negs, just to
clarify.
Provia 400 is a miserable film (also sold as Sensia II 400). It is
grainy, has poor color, often shifting very cyan, and is too contrasty
in bright light, which is the only way to get decent color out of it,
which
-Original Message-
From: Arthur Entlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 11:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: supra 400
Obviously the Provia films are slides and the Superia are
negs, just to
clarify.
Provia 400
Provia 400F is a new beast, and has received very good eviews. I have a few
rolls waiting for low light situations, but haven't used them yet.
Deservedly so , it behaves just like the 100F with very fine grain , just 2
stops faster..
I've had a magazine cover published with a pic shot
]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: 06 September 2001 16:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: supra 400
Obviously the Provia films are slides and the Superia are negs, just to
clarify.
Provia 400 is a miserable film (also sold as Sensia II 400). It is
grainy, has
On Thu, 6 Sep 2001 10:08:20 +1000 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?=
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Odd. I thought Tony said the SS4000 aliased less than 2700ppi scanners.
Can someone explain this to me? ISTM that people are seeing grain at
4000ppi
and calling it aliasing?
It is utterly
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality unacceptable. I was thinking
that I would have to bite the bullet and get drum scans
made, but it occurs to me that if aliasing is an
interference pattern
I have had great results scanning Sura 400 with both a
Canon 2710 and Minolta Scan Elite. I really like this
as my general purpose film, in fact.
Pat
--- John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need
to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get
Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem with Supra 400. Stopped
using it even though it is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
Tom
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality
I have the Nikon LS-30 (2700spi) and my results have been fair though not
poor.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 11:18 AM
Subject: filmscanners: supra 400
| I have a number
: Re: filmscanners: supra 400
| Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem with Supra 400. Stopped
| using it even though it is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
|
| Tom
|
| I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
| decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
Tom wrote:
Not an answer, but I had exactly the same problem
with Supra 400. Stopped using it even though it
is supposed to be 'scanner optimized'.
I have a number of supra 400 images that I will need to get
decent scans of. Using my SS4000 I get terrible grain
aliasing making the quality
Site at http://members.home.net/csgolf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Matturri
Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 2:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
Not to add to the weight of this thread
I recently had my Minolta Dual II replaced by Minolta, after only owning
it a week. The second one has lower noise in the shadow areas than
the first.
The first had a lot of green noise in the dense areas (on slides) which
I noted lessened quite a bit using Vuescan. I haven't tested the new
I have heard some horrible reviews of this film. Of course, it will
surely come up short if comparing it to Provia 100F. I'd love to
open up my world 2 stops in a decent manner.
Buy a roll and give it a try. I've only tried 400F the once, but I was
impressed by it. I thought the colour
: Thursday, August 02, 2001 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 11:44:30 -0700 Paul Chefurka
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I have the exact same problem with Supra 400 - red and green speckles in
the shadows. Like you, I can't get them
: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
| | I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan,
current
| | 7.1.7) except for the noise-like areas in dark parts of the image. At
| | times I can partially compensate for this by setting the black point
but
| | only at the cost of losing
://members.home.net/csgolf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JimD
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 6:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
I've experienced similar 'speckles' with Supra 400 and Royal
Gold 4000
In a message dated 08/01/2001 2:43:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My (admittedly drastic) solution has been to stop using Supra 400. I've
switched entirely to Provia 400F slide film, and I find it scans just
beautifully.
I have heard some horrible reviews of this
I have the exact same problem with Supra 400 - red and green speckles in
the shadows. Like you, I can't get them to disappear without blowing
away a lot of shadow detail. I don't know if a drum scan would solve
this or not - I've seen the same problem on both my SS4000 and my new
10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan, current
7.1.7) except for the noise-like areas in dark parts of the image. At
times I can partially compensate for this by setting the black point but
only
- Original Message -
From: John Matturri [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 9:33 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
| I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan, current
| 7.1.7) except for the noise
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Supra 400 shadows
I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan, current
7.1.7) except for the noise-like areas in dark parts of the image. At
times I can partially compensate for this by setting the black point but
only at the cost of losing
I've become quite fond of Provia 100F. It is sharp as a tack and
a joy to scan. Of course it does suffer in the exposure latitude
department. I'm still using negative films but am shifting more
to transparency film based on ease of scanning and the knock
your socks off quality of Provia.
| I've been having good results using Supra 400 (SS4000, Vuescan, current
| 7.1.7) except for the noise-like areas in dark parts of the image. At
| times I can partially compensate for this by setting the black point but
| only at the cost of losing shadow detail that at times is needed for
26 matches
Mail list logo
