Bob Geoghegan wrote:
> I know people out there have will opinions &/or informed speculation about
> this:
>
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0706/07061401kodakhighsens.asp
>
> The short version is that by replacing 1/2 of the sensor elements of a bayer
> pattern with panchromatic elements, Kodak clai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Secondly, some artifacts produced in the scanning process by prosummer
> scanners operated by layoperators may not be readily remedied or correctable
> at all in some cases.
And I'm sure THEY don't want to do any corrections, even if possible.
Mike K.
-
Paul Patton wrote:
> I thought the Polaroid Sprintscan was still highly regarded as a filmscanner.
.
All Polaroid scanners have been orphans for quite some time
now, I'm sure that affects price.
Mike K.
P.S. - I've still a sprintscan 35 which is undoubtedly worth less
than the postage to
Arthur Entlich wrote:
> Minolta was bought by Konica, and is now called Konica-Minolta. Have
> you contacted them to see if they offer such service or know who does?
>
Konica-Minolta, the combined version went through bankruptcy too
a few years ago, that's when Sony got hold of the Minolta camera
