Can someone answer a question about optimization?
I have MacFin2004b and optimization is not working. I do have "allow optimization" checked in the Staff Tool dialog box. It was working in all the previous versions.
All the best,
KIM Richmond
___
Finale
At 9:13 AM -0400 6/01/04, dhbailey wrote:
I'm not sure it would be possible, since staff styles are applied in
toto to the selected measures or parts of measures and the change is
immediate, whereas expressions are applied only when that point is
reached in real time.
Huh? I'm not
I want to upgrade my printer to one that has Postscript capabilities and find one that is reasonably priced, if possible, under $400, new or used, inkjet or laser, available in the United States. All replies will be appreciated.
Preston Keys
___
Finale
Hi all,
Something I ran into when switching to Fin 2004b MAC from Fin 2004 and
using iKey.
It seemed that iKey was not working in 2004b. What I need to do was
select Finale 2004b as a
new application in iKey and then copy over all of the sequences I had
created for 2004. Since I did this,
At 12:36 PM -0400 6/01/04, dhbailey wrote:
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 9:13 AM -0400 6/01/04, dhbailey wrote:
I'm not sure it would be possible, since staff styles are applied
in toto to the selected measures or parts of measures and the
change is immediate, whereas expressions are applied
This solution would work nicely for what I'm doing. I know that it's not
hard to add an expression, but aren't we all looking for a way to minimize
keystrokes? :)
Giz
The truly professional valve oil would be potable 80 proof!
At 09:13 AM 6/1/04, you wrote:
What might be nicer/easier would be
On 1 Jun 2004 at 20:26, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 01.06.2004 19:20 Uhr, David W. Fenton wrote
It's clear to me that for the A section, there should be a repeat
(leaving out the starting ||: is common well into the 19th century),
but not so clear about the C section. I'd make my decision
Johannes is right on the money on this question. Repeat signs were
not used in the modern way with any consistency before the 19th
century. It's covered well in Robert Donnington, The Interpretation
of Early Music. The only interpretation involved is studying how
the signs were used AT THAT
On 1 Jun 2004 at 16:42, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:42 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
In the abstract, I just don't think there's any way to make any such
determination with any certainty.
Yes, but Johannes is not evaluating in the abstract. He's evaluating
based on
