On 6 Jun 2004 at 8:13, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 22:17, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 4, 2004, at 9:29 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Lyric tool works well.
Really? Lyric tool works well if you know what you're doing, or if
you never do anything
On 6 Jun 2004 at 15:56, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 6, 2004, at 5:01 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Style sheets would be a fantastic addition to Finale!
I could be wrong, but my sense is that incorporating style sheets
directly into Finale is too impractical to even consider as a feature
request to
On 6 Jun 2004 at 21:13, John Howell wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/4/04, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:55 PM 06/04/2004, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
For example, I HATE the way Microsoft Word
makes assumptions about what I want done with my typing, like
correcting my spelling without telling me, or
On 7 Jun 2004 at 6:14, dhbailey wrote:
But if it's possible in web-sites with html programming, it can't be
that difficult to implement.
I agreed with everything you wrote up to this point.
You can't compare implementation across different domains.
HTML was designed from the very beginning
On Monday, June 7, 2004, at 11:11 AM, I wrote:
I accidentally set up a system of repeats whereby the Processing
Measures bit before playback was set in an endless loop. Is there
any way (MacFin2kb) to interrupt the process without Force Quitting
the program?
I just reread that, and I feel
Yes.
Hit the stop button.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Brad Beyenhof
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] Interrupt Processing Measures?
On Monday, June 7, 2004, at 11:11 AM, I wrote:
I
On 7 Jun 2004 at 12:03, Fisher, Allen wrote:
DON'T USE TYPE INTO SCORE
Why? In your entire rant about not using type into score, I didn't see
a clear reason why.
Rant?
The reason not to use type in score is that it creates a text stream
that doesn't really match the real text being set
Tried it.
Didn't work.
--
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday, June 7, 2004, at 11:28 AM, Fisher, Allen wrote:
Yes.
Hit the stop button.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf
Of Brad Beyenhof
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:22 PM
To: [EMAIL
I just created in infinite loop repeat and got 2k4b on both platforms to
stop processing when I hit the stop button...
On 6/7/04 1:58 PM, Allen Fisher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mac or PC?
On 6/7/04 1:34 PM, Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tried it.
Didn't work.
On 7 Jun 2004 at 11:22, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Monday, June 7, 2004, at 11:11 AM, I wrote:
I accidentally set up a system of repeats whereby the Processing
Measures bit before playback was set in an endless loop. Is there
any way (MacFin2kb) to interrupt the process without Force
I wrote:
For me, the advantage of this is that
when I find an error which has escaped proofreading early on, and
need to locate the error in the lyric dialogs, the tags make it much
easier to be assured I am looking in the right place.
prompting David Fenton to query:
Er, I don't understand.
On 7 Jun 2004 at 14:40, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
I wrote:
For me, the advantage of this is that
when I find an error which has escaped proofreading early on, and
need to locate the error in the lyric dialogs, the tags make it much
easier to be assured I am looking in the right place.
Hi Adrian,
Restarting the computer doesn't even begin to address the problem here.
Nor does it have anything to do with the Mac Fontpack (which I already
have) or the number of fonts in my fonts folder. This is a very
serious bug in Finale that has been a problem since Finale 2002,
although
David W. Fenton wrote:
The reason not to use type in score is that it creates a text stream
that doesn't really match the real text being set *unless* you have
very carefully ordered your typing in a way that will create a
comprehensible text in the actual data store. With click assignment,
On 07 Jun 2004, at 03:28 PM, MacSupport wrote:
Introducing Finale 2004. See the new features and pre-order today at
http://www.finalemusic.com/finale/f2k4/
Don't you think the support guys should update their signatures?
--
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote:
It 's not so much a matter of having separate text, as being able to
determine more easily while looking at the edit lyrics window which
syllables are assigned to which notes.
To which David responded,
Exactly why do you need to know this?
I have found the advantage of being able to fix
On 7 Jun 2004 at 17:09, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
I wrote:
It 's not so much a matter of having separate text, as being able to
determine more easily while looking at the edit lyrics window which
syllables are assigned to which notes.
To which David responded,
Exactly why do you need to
Where David W. Fenton writes:
But [using type into score] you have to do the entry in the correct order to get the lyrics to come out comprehensibly.
I would suggest instead, that one merely needs to understand how Finale
places syllables in the lyrics area of the data file, in order to be
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:47 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Seems to me that Lyrics got the way it is because it is an *old*
subsystem, dating back to very early versions of Finale, and the
changes to it have been bolted on the sides over time, making it
rather baroque and nearly impossible to figure out.
On Jun 7, 2004, at 5:24 AM, Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
(though I consider it a design flaw that when syllable counts are
changed in the edit lyrics box, syllables shift from the current
system to the next one, or from the next system to the current one,
depending upon whether the syllable count
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:59 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Yes, it *is* a problem with Type in Score, since certain kinds of
problems that pop up in Type in Score can only be figured out by
going to Edit Lyrics. I can't remember a specific example, but with
my Requiem example, that was where I got in
On Jun 7, 2004, at 3:14 AM, dhbailey wrote:
But if it's possible in web-sites with html programming, it can't be
that difficult to implement.
Right, but it's not the web-site that does the implementing, it's the
browser. The browser is essentially an interpreter of HTML code. The
analog would
David Bailey wrote:
A beta tester on another list has let drop that there more new features
coming in 2005, which is currently in beta-testing. Nothing specific
was said, but I just thought I would say they apparently are on schedule
for the normal August release of the new version.
I know
On 7 Jun 2004 at 16:12, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 7, 2004, at 10:47 AM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Indeed, a lot of very small changes could make Lyrics much more
usable (like allowing resizing of the click assignment dialog --
geez, how frigging hard would *that* be?),
Amen! And the Edit
At 2:07 PM -0400 6/7/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
Don't you folks always explore the menus of programs when you start
using them? With Microsoft programs on Windows, user controllable
options are stored on the Tools menu, under OPTIONS. Word also has
separate menu entries for Autocorrect. I don't if
Hey Brian, good stuff. One question:
4) Program 3 or 4 QuicKey macros to set the size of multimeasure rests
to
various lengths and use them on each part (every time you redo SPE it
resets
all multimeasure rests to the same default length defined in the
window you
click through).
Can you
Glad to be of help. :-)
Incidentally, there was some discussion a few years ago about Finale
programmers seriously considering getting rid of Special Part Extraction all
together. I wrote them a rather impassioned email that hopefully helped to
keep it around.
On the subject of linking score
On 07 Jun 2004, at 11:59 PM, Brian Williams wrote:
On the subject of linking score parts, I think that SPE would be the
best
way for a future version of Finale to do this (by storing entries
along with
multiple page layouts, spacings, text blocks and measure item
placements in
one file). This
Christopher wrote:
Any other tips?
One more thing: When I get to the harp piano parts, I load a 2-staff Page
Layout library -- with different system spacing than for single-staff parts
-- and use the Page Format tool to redefine all pages. This only takes a
couple of seconds (much less time
The problem is more in the press coverage, I think. This is not a
double-clicking patent; it is a patent on a specific way to combine
click, press, and double-click on cell-phone like devices in order to
launch applications. I've not aware of any prior art which meets the
patent claims, though I'm
Darcy wrote (in regard to my SPE method tip):
4) Program 3 or 4 QuicKey macros to set the size of multimeasure rests to
various lengths and use them on each part (every time you redo SPE it resets
all multimeasure rests to the same default length defined in the window you
click through).
31 matches
Mail list logo
