On Jun 15, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
I'm no expert, but I concur.
In my encounters with HP All-in-Ones (used with a Mac), I've found them
awkward and erratic. My mother bought one and she hated it so much
that after about a week she
On 16.06.2004 7:08 Uhr, Eric Dannewitz wrote
Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
Go get a cheap laser printer. A brother or something. I have a brother
1440 that is over two years old that I must have done about 20,000 pages
with, and it is a tank. The price is under $200 now. And I
I agree as well. My experience with all-in-ones is that they embody the
phrase Jack of All Trades, master of none. I used to have a gig with a
church, creating bulletins and newsletters and the HP all-in-one was nothing
but a problem.
If you're looking for recreational value, they're fine. My
On 16 Jun 2004 at 0:03, Mark D Lew wrote:
On Jun 15, 2004, at 10:08 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
I'm no expert, but I concur.
In my encounters with HP All-in-Ones (used with a Mac), I've found
them awkward and erratic. My mother bought one and
At 08:57 AM 6/16/04 -0700, Bob Colwell wrote:
Yeah, it eats ink. And those cartridges are expensive. Did you notice that
17% of HP's bottom line last quarter came directly from ink cartridge sales?
Do you all refill your inkjet cartridges? I keep two carts, one new and one
refilled. The
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
While I am sure all this is correct concerning the HP All-in-ones I don't
think one can damn inkjets altogether.
I have a Canon i865, and the ink costs are probably lower than the toner
costs of my HP Laserjet, especially if I buy third party ink cartridges,
which are 2.50
