Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Karen
Hi Brad, Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager (Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver with no problems so I don't think that is the cause. Just a thought... -Karen I

Re: [Finale] Finale 2006 still not Unicode

2005-09-01 Thread Phil Daley
At 8/31/2005 01:45 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote: Really? (Finale has got to be one of the last hold-outs [in an increasingly small group of non-internationalized software producers].) Is Finale limited to western European languages, then? (ISO-8859-1/ISO-8859-15 or Win-1252 encodings?) Yup, CP1252

[Finale] US copyright question

2005-09-01 Thread Johannes Gebauer
Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the printed edtion, not for the piece itself, which is from the 19th century)? Johannes -- http://www.musikmanufaktur.com http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de

Re: [Finale] US copyright question

2005-09-01 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 08:51 AM 09/01/2005, Johannes Gebauer wrote: Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the printed edtion, not for the piece itself, which is from the 19th century)? Yes. (Disclaimer: I'm not a copyright

Re: [Finale] US copyright question

2005-09-01 Thread dhbailey
Johannes Gebauer wrote: Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the printed edtion, not for the piece itself, which is from the 19th century)? Johannes If there was significant editorial input, it would be

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Gerald Berg
This is a 'standard' MAC fix on GPO too. Dump the reverb entirely and recieive no clicks -- quite a deal. Jerry On 31-Aug-05, at 5:01 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy CPU way down, would have exacerbated the clicks, etc, rather than improving

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 8/31/05, Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager (Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver with no problems so I don't think that is the cause. I do

Bach temperament, was: Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote: Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7. Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript? No... do you have a reference (preferably online) where I can read about

[Finale] test

2005-09-01 Thread kallisti
test ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

[Finale] test

2005-09-01 Thread Andrew Stiller
test Andrew Stiller Kallisti Music Press http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] test

2005-09-01 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 9/1/05, Andrew Stiller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: test Congratulations, you're back on the list! -- Brad Beyenhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://augmentedfourth.blogspot.com Silence will save me from being wrong (and foolish), but it will also deprive me of the possibility of being right. ~

[Finale] test

2005-09-01 Thread Andrew Stiller
test Andrew Stiller Kallisti Music Press http://home.netcom.com/~kallisti/ ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: Bach temperament, was: Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 9/1/05, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote: Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)^12=(2/1)^7. Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript? No... do you have a

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Dean M. Estabrook
I'll give it a try. Dean On Sep 1, 2005, at 6:18 AM, Gerald Berg wrote: This is a 'standard' MAC fix on GPO too. Dump the reverb entirely and recieive no clicks -- quite a deal. Jerry On 31-Aug-05, at 5:01 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote: Hmm, I would have thought that moving the Qualtiy

Re: Bach temperament, was: Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Sep 2005 at 18:34, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 18:07 Uhr Brad Beyenhof wrote: Life would be so much easier if only (3/2)12=(2/1)7. Have you heard about the recently discovered Bach tuning, which is hidden on the title page of the well-tempered manuscript? No... do you have a

Re: [Finale] US copyright question

2005-09-01 Thread Noel Stoutenburg
A bit more comprehensive answer to what Johannes Gebauer wrote, than what I've seen thus far: Just out of curiosity, I am currently wondering whether a printed edition from 1978 in the US is still under copyright (for the printed edtion, not for the piece itself, which is from the 19th

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 18:21 Uhr dc wrote: It is only one of numerous Bach tunings! And most specialists in the field of temperament and tuning simply didn't buy it... No-one has even started to prove that the squiggle in question is in Bach's hand (no research has been done on the original). And then, there are

Re: Bach temperament, was: Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 23:03 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote: It's clearly not real scholarship, because real scholars don't make claims like: [snip] David, I don't doubt you are right, yet that doesn't actually say anything about the findings, it just says something about the scholar. His methods may be

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Sep 2005 at 23:17, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 18:21 Uhr dc wrote: It is only one of numerous Bach tunings! And most specialists in the field of temperament and tuning simply didn't buy it... No-one has even started to prove that the squiggle in question is in Bach's hand (no

Re: Bach temperament, was: Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread David W. Fenton
On 1 Sep 2005 at 23:43, Johannes Gebauer wrote: On 23:03 Uhr David W. Fenton wrote: It's clearly not real scholarship, because real scholars don't make claims like: [snip] David, I don't doubt you are right, yet that doesn't actually say anything about the findings, it just says

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Karen
Hi Brad, I'd bet that APE is causing the symptoms you were describing. I was also using ClearDock and had to remove it. So, get rid of Clear Dock and the APE manager all together and see if things get better. Here is an alternative you can try$8.00 Sharware/Donationware. I

Re: [Finale] Is Finale 2006 trustable for Mac yet?

2005-09-01 Thread Brad Beyenhof
On 9/1/05, I wrote: On 8/31/05, Karen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you running any Haxies...anything that uses the APE manager (Application Enhancer per Unsanity??) These can cause many problems. I took them all off of my machine. I run Quicksilver with no problems so I don't think that

[Finale] Finale 2006 still not Unicode

2005-09-01 Thread Michael Good
Finale 2006 is still not Unicode, but it is *not* limited to the Western European characters in Cp1252 / MacRoman. Finale supports many different scripts, including double-byte characters for Japanese and other languages. We've been busy collecting examples of different languages for our XML