David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip]
Perhaps many of the people who use playback casually never bothered
to figure out how to do some of these things, and that's why they
found Finale playback inadequate -- not because Finale playback *was*
inadequate, but because their knowledge of how to control
Urm. I'm not talking about the overwrite bug. I'm talking about the bug you
asked about.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Dussault
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 9:24 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Data-erasing bug in
D. Fenton:
I
don't feel the non-beaming [of old vocal music] conveys anything
useful that is not quite
clear from word continuation symbols along with judiciously-placed
slurs.
A problem arises, though, when you have a vocal part with slurs in the
original. In the old style of vocal
On Nov 6, 2005, at 7:15 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
Why would one keep the beam breaks and then discard most of the
reversed beams?
I don't believe either Johannes or I gave any indication of how many of
the reversed beams we discarded.
Yes, sometimes these give indications about register
On 07.11.2005 Andrew Stiller wrote:
Why would one keep the beam breaks and then discard most of the
reversed beams?
I don't believe either Johannes or I gave any indication of how many
of the reversed beams we discarded.
Actually, I do discard most of them. The only exception I can think
Which brings up a couple of questions (I'm on mac 2005b):
1. Is there any way to get the jazz HP style to swing and stay swinging at a
setting of 75 instead of the default 100? When I try to adjust this in the
playback controls I have to reset it over and over again, for almost every
playback.
On Nov 7, 2005, at 12:01 PM, Don Hart wrote:
Which brings up a couple of questions (I'm on mac 2005b):
1. Is there any way to get the jazz HP style to swing and stay
swinging at a
setting of 75 instead of the default 100? When I try to adjust
this in the
playback controls I have to reset
On 7 Nov 2005 at 8:49, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
In 18th century sources reversed beams can happen (and are likely to
happen) whenever there is a larger leap within a beamed group. That's
all there is to it, imo.
But leaps mean something and the reversed beams, I believe, help mark
them
Just so you don't get me wrong: I am not trying to convince you of anything.
On 07.11.2005 David W. Fenton wrote:
But leaps mean something and the reversed beams, I believe, help mark
them clearly. To me, by removing them, you are removing one of the
clues to contour that could be helpful to a
Thanks Allen, that's what I wanted to know.
Le 05-11-07 à 10:01, Fisher, Allen a écrit :
Urm. I'm not talking about the overwrite bug. I'm talking about the
bug you asked about.
Éric Dussault
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
10 matches
Mail list logo
