Hello!
From now on, the future Finale plug-in updates on the Mac side will
require OSX 10.7 or later. (Today's updates of JW Pattern and JW
Staff Polyphony were the last OSX 10.4 Carbon plug-ins I'll release.)
The future plug-in releases will be based my Cocoa UI framework instead,
which
I know this is an old topic that has been batted around many times. I
have owned several of the scanning products (Smartscore, Photoscore, and
SharpEye). The last time I used any of them was about 7 years ago. Of
the 3, I could sometimes get marginal results with SharpEye, but usually
there
On 1/22/2014 10:22 AM, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
I know this is an old topic that has been batted around many times. I
have owned several of the scanning products (Smartscore, Photoscore, and
SharpEye). The last time I used any of them was about 7 years ago. Of
the 3, I could sometimes get
Hi Craig,
I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for this to get much better if I were you…
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On Jan 22, 2014, at 10:22 AM, Craig Parmerlee cr...@acticalc.com wrote:
I know this is an old topic that has been batted around many times. I
After watching Tom Johnson of Finale scan in clinics with relative ease I have
gone back to scanning. He tells us that certain scanners are better than others
for scanning and that a dpi of 500 or better will achieve optimal results. 300
dpi is pretty awful in scanning music even though we were
It works fine for mea few hints:
Do not scan the music in a scanner and then try to convert it.
Open Finale and scan from within Finale
Also, only a very few scanners actually work. A very very few.
I use an Epson V33 and have no trouble scanning well engraved music.
Hope this helps,
I used a variety of scan formats and they all produced identical
results. One was a 600 BPI TIFF grey scale.
It is hard to believe that the scanner model would make such a
difference because the image at 600 BPI is extremely crisp on my scanner
(which happens to be a Brother.
I did some
I gave up with scanning music - there were so many mistakes that it was
easier and quicker to re-type the entire document than scan, check and
correct.
Sorry,
Lawrence
On 22 January 2014 19:54, Craig Parmerlee cr...@parmerlee.com wrote:
I used a variety of scan formats and they all produced
Hey Terry,
I have an HP Photosmart 6520. Will that work?
John Witmer
- Original Message -
From: Terry Vosbein vosbe...@wlu.edu
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] Anybody having any success with scanning?
It works fine for mea few
I have an HP Scanjet G4010 and it scans into Finale pretty well.
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
NEW! cel.647-292-4605
From: wit...@nctv.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:02:57 -0500
Subject: Re: [Finale] Anybody having any success with scanning?
Has anyone had any trouble hiding staves in the 2014 finale? Sometimes the
staves are hidden properly, and sometimes they show up even if they're empty. I
have a staff style that can force hiding, but I don't need to tell you how
awkward this is. Does any of you recognize a problem here?
Aaron
One more try with this question, as there was no response.
Any suggestions, my friends?
Dr.A.S.Weinstangel
sasha.weinstan...@utoronto.ca
NEW! cel.647-292-4605
From: dr...@hotmail.com
To: finale@shsu.edu
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 12:37:29 -0500
Subject: [Finale] tambourine sound
Open the Score Manager and select your tambourine staff.
Set Notation Style to Percussion and select Maracas, Tambourine
Shakers
in the Percussion layout selection dialog, then click on Select.
Back in Score Manager set the Perc. MIDI Map of the tambourine staff
to General MIDI and assign
When you say it scans pretty well, do you mean that most of the time
it accurately recognizes these things:
* Key sigs
* Meter marks
* Dotted notes and ties
* Slurs
* Repeats and endings
* Common dynamics and hairpins
* Multi-measure repeats
and doesn't add a bunch of extraneous notes you have
That does seem to be the experience of the majority. However, the
vendors claim great success and apparently some people are finding it
good enough to use, at least occasionally. If there are
hardware/software/parameter combinations that improve the results, I'd
like to discover that because
15 matches
Mail list logo
