This is a good point. For a slur to be broken (using either method offered here), the
slur must be measure-attached.
Johannes Gebauer:
> Staff lines can be broken by using Expressions with opaque enclosures.
> However, I don't think those will cover slurs, at least not in the
> print-out.
This will work, but it is the old way of doing it. The new way--much easier--is to use
a text expression with an opaque enclosure.
Dan Carno wrote:
>
> You can enter the numbers in the Shape designer (expression tool), adding a
> white mask box to each. (Once you have done one, simply duplicat
On 16.09.2004 13:57 Uhr, Giovanni Andreani wrote
> I'm working on a part what needs a lot of fingering marks most of which
> overlap slurs and staff lines; which would be the best way to brake lines
> and slurs in a way to leave a little empty space around the fingering numbers?
Staff lines can b
Hello Giovanni,
You can enter the numbers in the Shape designer (expression tool), adding a
white mask box to each. (Once you have done one, simply duplicate & change
the number). Your numbers will then "white out" most musical elements.
Good luck!
Dan
At 08:28 AM 9/16/2004, you wrote:
Ciao Gi
Ciao Giovanni.
Use a enclosure with line width zero and set to opaque. This work in the
Expression Tool not in the Articulation one.
Javier.
> I'm working on a part what needs a lot of fingering marks most of which
> overlap slurs and staff lines; which would be the best way to brake lines
> an
I'm working on a part what needs a lot of fingering marks most of which
overlap slurs and staff lines; which would be the best way to brake lines
and slurs in a way to leave a little empty space around the fingering numbers?
Thank you
Giovanni Andreani
___
