David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip)
Does anyone know if MakeMusic is intending to provide finer control
over HP parameters than one finds in Finale 2005?
And, ACK, why does everything have REVERB turned up so high? Reverb
doesn't improve synthesized sound at all -- just makes it harder to
hear!
On 15 Jul 2005 at 6:30, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip)
Does anyone know if MakeMusic is intending to provide finer control
over HP parameters than one finds in Finale 2005?
And, ACK, why does everything have REVERB turned up so high? Reverb
doesn't improve
David,
You can apply HP selectively using the Apply Human Playback plugin.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 15 Jul 2005, at 3:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005 at 6:30, dhbailey wrote:
David W. Fenton wrote:
[snip)
Does anyone know if MakeMusic is intending to
On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
The ability to have sections of the piece without HP (which is
implied by the ability to apply different styles of HP to different
parts) was something I assumed was part of the basic HP
implementation. I had assumed there'd be a No HP staff
On 15 Jul 2005 at 15:43, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:34 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
The ability to have sections of the piece without HP (which is
implied by the ability to apply different styles of HP to different
parts) was something I assumed was part of the basic HP
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:20 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
No you weren't. The Apply Human Playback plugin can be applied to
selected passages of a work, and the HP style that you select can be
None.
I answered this in reply to Darcy, but it seems quite clear to me
that this plugin does something
On 15 Jul 2005 at 15:36, Darcy James Argue wrote:
You can apply HP selectively using the Apply Human Playback plugin.
That's very different from what I understood the Finale web page to
say. That plugin writes the human playback data into the file's
permanent MIDI data.
That's quite
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
So, as I said, the web page is misleading, if not outright lying.
I agree, it's a bit misleading. The actual new features are under the
New in Finale 2006 heading.
The bullet points below Listen to the difference are all Fin2k5
features.
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:38 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
So, as I said, the web page is misleading, if not outright lying.
I agree, it's a bit misleading. The actual new features are under the
New in Finale 2006 heading.
The bullet points
On 15 Jul 2005 at 16:38, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 4:33 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
So, as I said, the web page is misleading, if not outright lying.
I agree, it's a bit misleading. The actual new features are under the
New in Finale 2006 heading.
The bullet points
Ever since the unfortunate demise of JW Tempo for Mac, I've been
looking for an easy way to tell Finale Change smoothly from q=X to q=Y
over Z number of measures.
I know tempo improvements are coming in Fin2k6, but is there any *easy*
way to do this in FinMac2k5?
(And just in case, using
Ever since the unfortunate demise of JW Tempo for Mac, I've been
looking for an easy way to tell Finale Change smoothly from q=X to q=Y
over Z number of measures.
I know tempo improvements are coming in Fin2k6, but is there any *easy*
way to do this in FinMac2k5?
(And just in case, using
Human Playback usually does it pretty well. Just make
sure to have an expression at the end set to the
desired target tempo, and put the accel expression
where you want it to start.
Tyler
--- Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ever since the unfortunate demise of JW Tempo for
Mac,
On 15 Jul 2005, at 00:45, Tyler Turner wrote:Human Playback usually does it pretty well. Just makesure to have an _expression_ at the end set to thedesired target tempo, and put the accel _expression_where you want it to start.I don't understand how to do this. Target tempo, OK, but how do I
--- John Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 00:45, Tyler Turner wrote:
Human Playback usually does it pretty well. Just
make
sure to have an expression at the end set to the
desired target tempo, and put the accel expression
where you want it to start.
I don't
On 15 Jul 2005, at 02:28, Tyler Turner wrote:
--- John Bell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 00:45, Tyler Turner wrote:
Human Playback usually does it pretty well. Just
make
sure to have an expression at the end set to the
desired target tempo, and put the accel
I've had mixed success with accel. rit. markings. Sometimes it
works fairly well. Other times, it does nothing. Most of the time,
it doesn't make a smooth transition from one tempo to the new
tempo. Perhaps it doesn't work well over short distances (2
measures or less?), with changes
John Bell wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 00:45, Tyler Turner wrote:
Human Playback usually does it pretty well. Just make
sure to have an expression at the end set to the
desired target tempo, and put the accel expression
where you want it to start.
I don't understand how to do this. Target
You leave it undefined. That's HP's job. It's supposed
to look for the word accel (or variations of it) and
then look forward to the next tempo marking (if any)
to determine the tempo curve. If it doesn't do that,
report it on the Finale forum as a bug for Robert and
send it into customer
19 matches
Mail list logo
