I upgraded to 2005b - even though they mention improved number
positioning in regards to the shape -- my easy problem from before is
still there - which basically means there is not a good default setting
one can use, because the tuplet number will be off-center vertically
when dealing with low
I suggest trying 2005b.
Chuck
On Feb 17, 2005, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Schaller wrote:
My tuplet number was set to Times - no weird font here and still it behaves as pointed out earlier - John Blane mentioned that this might have happened in the 2005 maintenance release - which sounds right, since
My tuplet number was set to Times - no weird font here and still it
behaves as pointed out earlier - John Blane mentioned that this might
have happened in the 2005 maintenance release - which sounds right,
since I hadn't upgraded before and got different results when I
compared files on-screen
Dear Thomas,
I had similar problems because I was using TempoTime font for the tuplet number, and the Font Annotation (FAN) file for that font is adjusted differently. Since I didn't want to fuss with changing that (maybe it's easy, but it's unfamiliar to me, so I don't know), I just changed the
No, I didn't - just got the new chapter 20 from Steve.
After playing a bit around I have to say though that the Avoid Staves
feature is broken -- there is no way in getting the same result for
high and low notes in regards too placement of the tuplet number - try
entering 3 quarter note tuplets
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:30:13 +0100, Jari Williamsson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Schaller wrote:
> > My tuplet settings say: Engraver Tuplet -- whereas in the documentation
> > it says Enhanced Tuplets - is it just a different naming procedure, or
> > are there new options that the PDF fil
Are you looking at the right pdf manual? I'll send you the chapter
seperately.
On Feb 17, 2005, at 1:23 PM, Thomas Schaller wrote:
My tuplet settings say: Engraver Tuplet -- whereas in the
documentation it says Enhanced Tuplets - is it just a different naming
procedure, or are there new options
Thomas Schaller wrote:
My tuplet settings say: Engraver Tuplet -- whereas in the documentation
it says Enhanced Tuplets - is it just a different naming procedure, or
are there new options that the PDF files don't reflect yet?
It was renamed (in Fin2005a) from Enhanced Tuplets to Engraver Tuplets
My tuplet settings say: Engraver Tuplet -- whereas in the documentation
it says Enhanced Tuplets - is it just a different naming procedure, or
are there new options that the PDF files don't reflect yet?
Thanks,
Thomas Schaller
On Feb 17, 2005, at 12:54 PM, Steve Gibons wrote:
Do you mean someth
Do you mean something more than what is in Chapter 20: Tuplet Tool?
On Feb 17, 2005, at 12:41 PM, Thomas Schaller wrote:
Hi,
I was playing with the 2005 tuplet settings and couldn't get any
satisfying results - when I tried to find documentation on things like
"Engraver Tuplet" there wasn't anyth
Hi,
I was playing with the 2005 tuplet settings and couldn't get any
satisfying results - when I tried to find documentation on things like
"Engraver Tuplet" there wasn't anything there either (not on
MakeMusic's site nor on the net nor in the PDF section) - did I miss
something?
Thanks,
Thom
11 matches
Mail list logo
