Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread dhbailey
Jonathan Smith wrote: Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? Yes, it saves a lot of your time. It just takes a little patience to learn the ropes. Going back to part extraction will seem like the dark ages. Jonathan P.S. Any chan

[Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread Jonathan Smith
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? Yes, it saves a lot of your time. It just takes a little patience to learn the ropes. Going back to part extraction will seem like the dark ages. Jonathan P.S. Any chance of breaking down y

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread shirling & neueweise
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? i consider this feature to be a **major** improvement to the programme. I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes this is a

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread Johannes Gebauer
On 26.02.2007 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes, but if you insert or delete measures, change end

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread dhbailey
Yes, I've done several works using the linked-score/parts feature and it's been fine. It's not as easy as MakeMusic would have us believe, nor is it a feature which is right for everybody or every job yet. But it is a good first step, it does work well for some projects, and I can see it gro

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-26 Thread verngraham
Has anyone on this list come up with any clear advantages to even having a Linked Parts feature? I understand if you make some revisions (accidentals, etc.) in the score it updates the parts behind the scenes, but if you insert or delete measures, change endings & repeats, or make any extensive cha

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-24 Thread Kim Richmond
Thanks Aaron. On Feb 24, 2007, at 10:00 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:30:06 -0500 From: Aaron Sherber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe To: finale@shsu.edu, FINALE FINALE LIST Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type

Re: [Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-23 Thread Aaron Sherber
At 09:48 PM 2/23/2007, Kim Richmond wrote: >I quickly learned that that meant there were >measures filled with music not showing on the part. The solution was, >on each part, with the Measure Tool selected, choose Create >Multimeasure Rests. That reveals the hidden music. But it has to be >done on

[Finale] MULTIMEASURE catastrophe

2007-02-23 Thread Kim Richmond
OK, here's another shortcoming for MacFin2007c, and this one almost completely sabotaged my rehearsal of my orchestra today. It's a good thing is wasn't a recording session. In going to tweak Linked Parts after placing all entries in the score, I discovered that some measures were left out w