The Ricoh's regular tray does not support custom-size paper, like
9x12 or 9.5x12.5. The only way to print on those sizes is to use
the bypass tray.
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 29 Nov 2006, at 12:44 AM, Raymond Horton wrote:
I like my Ricoh AP2610 very much.
Hmm, I have been spending five minutes experimenting and I see the
problem to which you are referring. The Ricoh doesn't want to accept
custom sizes in the regular tray if it knows about them, but will print
to them if it thinks it is another size...
Depending on the project, one might be
Andrew
There are three models of the 5100. The DTN is the model that has the
duplexer. The TN has everything but the duplexer and a bit less ram,
and the N is a bare bones model with no print server card and only
one tray besides the multipurpose tray. The legal sized duplexing
issue
Hi Johannes,
I have to say, I'm a little nervous about buying used or refurbished.
But, that aside -- does anyone know offhand the differences between
those two models? Is it just the speed (PPM)?
Cheers,
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 28 Nov 2006, at 2:31 AM, Johannes
Darcy,
I shared your reluctance to buy a used unit, but last Friday was the first anniversary of
my buying an HP 5siMX from a local volume dealer here in Indianapolis. I also
prematurely retired a Ricoh.
I paid $375 for the 5si and it's still going strong. It has the duplexer in it,
and it
Hello Darcy,
I work with two 5000s and a 5100. The 5100 is faster and the 5000 are older,
other than that there are really no differences that I can tell. I have had
some font issues where the 5100 would not print properly but the 5000 would
printing the same document. I've also had it the other
On Nov 28, 2006, at 3:03 AM, Darcy James Argue wrote:
I have to say, I'm a little nervous about buying used or refurbished.
But, that aside -- does anyone know offhand the differences between
those two models? Is it just the speed (PPM)?
Don't be too nervous; a refurbished printer is
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
I've had my 5000s since they first came out and
have never had to make a call for service, very reliable. They are
worth the
money IMO.
I have never purchased the duplex tray so I have no experience with
dulpexing.
The duplexer is no
On Nov 28, 2006, at 9:33 AM, Fiskum, Steve wrote:
I've had my 5000s since they first came out and
have never had to make a call for service, very reliable. They are
worth the
money IMO.
I have never purchased the duplex tray so I have no experience with
dulpexing.
The duplexer
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:32 PM, RPM Seattle wrote:
I have a duplexer on each of my two 5100s, and neither one will print
duplex (two sided) legal from Mac OSX. This may be a mac driver issue
(broken duplexer is ruled out because neither works), but buyer
beware, if you want to do legal
Nope. It's always been an option, usually indicated by a 'd' after
the model number.
J D Thomas
ThomaStudios
On Nov 28, 2006, at 2:41 PM, Andrew Stiller wrote:
Also, I coulda swore the duplexer was integral to the 5100, not an
extra.
___
If anyone has any info about whether there is in fact a new-and-
improved, more robust duplexer for the LaserJet 5200, I'd be very
much obliged. The ability to duplex 100# offset (i.e. 40 lb. bond)
paper is a very big priority for me.
It sounds like I may be better off simply buying a new
,
BC
- Original Message -
From: Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Finale] TAN: Large-format laser
If anyone has any info about whether there is in fact a new-and- improved,
more robust duplexer
If anyone has any info about whether there is in fact a new-and-
improved, more robust duplexer for the LaserJet 5200, I'd be very
much obliged. The ability to duplex 100# offset (i.e. 40 lb. bond)
paper is a very big priority for me.
It sounds like I may be better off simply buying a new
Hi Lee,
I'd be very surprised if the duplexer for the 5200 involved any
substantial
engineering changes from the 5100 duplexer. In any case, it's
rated for a
max paper weight of 120 g/sq.m., which is equivalent to 32 lb. bond
or 80
lb. offset, so I suspect the 100 lb. offset paper (148
I wrote:
No -- although you're right that I didn't mean 67 lb. bond. I'm
talking about letter-size Hammermill Cover Stock, which is
advertised as 67 lb., but checking the packaging, I see it's 148
g/m2. This is close to 40 lb. bond and just a bit thicker than the
9x12 100# offset paper I
I'd be very surprised if the duplexer for the 5200 involved any
substantial
engineering changes from the 5100 duplexer. In any case, it's
rated for a
max paper weight of 120 g/sq.m., which is equivalent to 32 lb. bond
or 80
lb. offset, so I suspect the 100 lb. offset paper (148
I like my Ricoh AP2610 very much. I don't own the duplexer, and I don't
use the bypass tray for large paper, or even for letter-sized paper.
For double-sided printing, no matter what the quantity, I simply load
the paper, after printing one side, into the regular tray. Works quite
well.
I just talked with Santa, and he says you've been a good boy (mostly),
and that he'll get you a 5100. Well maybe. There was that thing you did
in October he was a little iffy iffy about ;-)
Seriously though, if you are using it a lot, and it sounds like you are,
then get something worth it. I
On 28.11.2006 Darcy James Argue wrote:
So -- I'm rapidly approaching the point where I'm ready to throw the damn thing
out the window and look for a replacement. I know everyone always recommends
the HP 5100, but that's (still) absurdly expensive. Does anyone have an
alternative they would
20 matches
Mail list logo
