Jari Williamsson wrote:
But why would Igor decide the rules, why couldn't the user define the
rules?
This goes to my deepest frustration with notation programs. Almost every
time I have turned to developers at one or another of the software firms
with a request for help to do something
Obviously, the notation product is a very long way off and there are no
examples to
show yet, but here's the first blog post by Daniel Spreadbury announcing the
project:
http://blog.steinberg.net/2013/02/welcome/
If Daniel is associated with the project, then I am optimistic (Now, if he
(Now, if he could only get me off the Igor Noteheads mailing list, then he
would be a true hero!)
Me too!
Four years into daily Finale use I still hit things that were far quicker in
Igor.
Basic thinks like slur entry, dynamic entry, hairpin entry, proper linked parts,
ability to grab
On 2013-02-21 14:02, Steve Parker wrote:
It is to be hoped that Steinberg take a look at Igor.
...or they could try to be really innovative for a change? Although Igor
went much further than anything else in terms of innovative thinking,
Igor was still just a variation on the same theme. IMO,
When Igor came out it was entirely different. New features in fairly recent
versions of Finale and Sibelius were present at the start of Igor more than a
decade ahead of its time.
Can you explain more the direction you're thinking?
Modeless operation; ability to easily enter dynamics, slurs,
On 2013-02-21 15:33, Steve Parker wrote:
Can you explain more the direction you're thinking?
Just some examples:
* Some Finale users thought Sibelius 7 was a good choice just because it
now had an input mode where the duration/pitch entry sequence was
reversed. Why should such things even be
The yet-to-be-named notation product already has a blog, written by Daniel
Spreadbury, who is part of the development team:
http://blog.steinberg.net
Cheers,
- DJA
-
WEB: http://www.secretsocietymusic.org
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:05 PM, Darcy James Argue djar...@earthlink.net wrote:
This
More power to them - it can only help the industry.
Not much showing on the page right now - that Dvorak example is pretty
lame. But it is early.
Raymond Horton
Bass Trombonist, Louisville Orchestra
Minister of Music, Edwardsville (IN) UMC
Composer, Arranger
VISIT US AT rayhortonmusic.com
On
Actually, that Dvořák example is in Sibelius. — Andrew
On 21 February 2013 15:42, Raymond Horton horton.raym...@gmail.com wrote:
More power to them - it can only help the industry.
Not much showing on the page right now - that Dvorak example is pretty
lame. But it is early.
Raymond Horton
That is funny!
RBH
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Andrew Moschou and...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, that Dvořák example is in Sibelius. — Andrew
On 21 February 2013 15:42, Raymond Horton horton.raym...@gmail.com
wrote:
More power to them - it can only help the industry.
Not much
That Sibelius image was selected by the website reporting on the story,
http://createdigitalmusic.com.
Obviously, the notation product is a very long way off and there are no
examples to show yet, but here's the first blog post by Daniel Spreadbury
announcing the project:
11 matches
Mail list logo
