In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] John Howell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KCM:
1) Why are string fingerings taught by positions? does it result in the
pupil learning to choose good fingerings quickly, or is it just the
easiest way to teach?
JH:
Much in string playing (and not just in string playing!)
The marking A doi [voce] con Ritornelli di Violini di Viole à
beneplacito is not in correct Italian; that, should be: A due [voci]
con Ritornelli di Violini e di Viole a beneplacito, which one could
interpret as an indication of executing colla parte (literally, with
the score), when the violins
At 02:52 AM 08/16/2004, d. collins wrote:
I see there's even an option to have it on top of score staff
and top of part staff, which is perfect for me.
Yes -- if those are the only places you want it, you don't need to muck
around with any of the individual staff settings.
Aaron.
The previous topic related to scanning music pushed me to post the
following, just to hear if anyone can give an update about importing
music software's reliability. On Macworld of september 04 there's 'n
article by Christopher Breen called Music Recognition Programs, where
SmartScore 3.2 and
I have used Finale's Smart Score Lite and found it better than I expected. I
was scanning in harpsichord music and, in many cases had very few errors.
Usually the measures that were wrong were VERY wrong and had to be redone
completely with Speedy, but overall this was faster than doing it all in
Reports that I've heard also say that SharpEye, which saves as MusicXML does
a really good job as well.
On 8/16/04 8:26 AM, Richard Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have used Finale's Smart Score Lite and found it better than I expected. I
was scanning in harpsichord music and, in many cases
On 15.08.2004 21:38 Uhr, Andrew Stiller wrote
Finally, musicians of the period would not have hesitated to combine
viola on the top part with bass gamba on the lower.
Don't get me wrong - I have no doubts you are right, but can you tell me
where you got this from? Is this just a guess or do you
On 16 Aug 2004 at 11:57, Andrew Stiller wrote:
On 15.08.2004 21:38 Uhr, Andrew Stiller wrote
Finally, musicians of the period would not have hesitated to
combine viola on the top part with bass gamba on the lower.
Don't get me wrong - I have no doubts you are right, but can you tell
Jari, if you're out there -- now that Coda has released info about Fin2005,
can you post your review so that we can see what's *really* interesting?
Thanks,
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
More reasonable upgrade price. The Tuplet placements and repeats stuff
might be all I'd use in the new upgrade..
There is a LOT of fluff in this new version.
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
http://www.finalemusic.com/finale/features/new/
A few of the new features are marketing fluff, but some of
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
More reasonable upgrade price. The Tuplet placements and repeats stuff
might be all I'd use in the new upgrade..
There is a LOT of fluff in this new version.
But then there's been a lot of fluff in each new version since about
Fin97. We old veterans have to face
dhbailey wrote:
As always, we have to hope that the non-fluff improvements are worth the
price of admission.
Absolutely. Grace notes and tuplets sorted out, if they live up to the
promise, will reduce my workload by about half in many pieces.
___
Indeed, but the Fluff level is pretty extreme this time. Lanch menu?
Performance Assessment? Now isn't the latter starting to blur with
SmartMusic? I like that you can save Finale pieces to SmartMusic,
but.having Finale now acts a scaled down SmartMusic thing is getting
a little too fluffy
Friends
FWIW, I ordered my upgrade; scheduled to ship this coming Friday.
ns
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Brad:
For me, the hybrid CD alone will be a Godsend as I intend to buy a Mac
soon (whenever the G5 Powerbooks come out) and I'll be glad not to have
to deal with two separate pieces of software.
Me:
Just before I bought my 15 G4 PowerBook (with which I am extremely
happy and on which
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:05:02 -0500, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I ordered my upgrade; scheduled to ship this coming Friday.
Whoa... I didn't think it would ship so soon. I thought this was more
of an announcement of features, and not really an announcement of
actual
Hi Neal,
Due respect, but your friend is dead wrong. Of course there will be G5
PowerBooks. Steve Jobs had originally said by the end of 2004 but
IBM has had a lot of trouble on the manufacturing end, so that's likely
no longer in the cards. But there will certainly be G5 PowerBooks
Aaron Sherber writes:
Jari, if you're out there -- now that Coda has released info about Fin2005,
can you post your review so that we can see what's *really* interesting?
I will post a review! However, I'm waiting for my contact at MM to
give me the go-ahead signal for the posting of the
On to round two of the playback speed problem (Mac OSX 10.2.8, Finale
2004c). There's one file I am sure of having a problem (playback tempo
stays at 120 even if I change settings to any other tempo). This one
used the new drum groove plugin. There were no initial text entrees for
a beginning
On 16 Aug 2004, at 04:40 PM, Lynn Gold wrote:
Apple rarely does major product releases at San Francisco MacWorld
because
it comes just after Christmas.
I'm afraid you are mistaken. Apple *frequently* announces major
products at the January MacWorld conference. In fact, the G4
PowerBooks were
I just wrote:
I will post a review! However, I'm waiting for my contact at MM to
give me the go-ahead signal for the posting of the review.
FYI: I can post the review tomorrow (Tuesday)!
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale mailing list
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2004 15:05:02 -0500, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I ordered my upgrade; scheduled to ship this coming Friday.
Whoa... I didn't think it would ship so soon. I thought this was more
of an announcement of features, and not really an
On Aug 16, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Yeah, I agree. When he sang at the Super Bowl, it was as unto a breath
of fresh air in an otherwise putrid, stale, showboat of hype. I
remember my head jerking up to attention.
I'm in the opera world, and the opera snobs get all bent out
I'm in the opera world, and the opera snobs get all bent out of shape when
Groban is marketed as classical or, worse, operatic, which he surely
isn't.
I think the fact that he is sort of out of place in time is interesting.
The most popular male singers of this day are so far removed from
So why is this list getting these messages?!?!?!
Crystal Premo wrote:
I'm in the opera world, and the opera snobs get all bent out of shape
when Groban is marketed as classical or, worse, operatic, which he
surely isn't.
I think the fact that he is sort of out of place in time is
interesting.
Maybe there's some fluff, maybe not. But they hit the two biggest
product defects, IMHO: tuplets and repeats. If they even got those
halfway right, 90 bucks for that is a no-brainer. I'll make that up in
productivity savings on the very first project. And if, by some stroke
of good
26 matches
Mail list logo
