In Simple Entry Options, remove the checkmark by Check for Extra
Notes. You can now put in a whole note rest with Simple Entry and move
it vertically using the arrow keys, without having to change to Speedy.
Michael Cook
On 7 avr. 05, at 03:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps that is the root
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no logical
justification, except Microsoft's continuing incomprehension of why
the Mac UI is superior to their own.
At least youse guys HAVE alt-key navigation that is usable. 8-(
OK after the pure joy of ease of what was Mac sys 9 Oneclick -- I have
tried to make the move to this most absurdly underhelpful Quackeys.
The help section is almost entirely made up of one sentence responses
which inevitably prove circular -- all I want are some menu pull down
actions and it
I have a piece with a few bars in A major.
Just for these bars I want to show the F,C,G sharps as well as the
notated accidentals.
I know I can change these individually but have lots of instances like
this and need to save time(as usual).
I have TG tools but this seems to add accidentals to
Is there a better program out there? This one is perfectly insulting.
Works great for me. Does some very complex tasks and saves me a massive amount
of time.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Well, I am glad I am not the only one who completely gave up on Quickeys
after struggling with it for a week.
Unfortunately the choices are not that great. I am currently back on
iKey 2. Given the choice now I would have stayed with iKey 1, but since
once I converted all my macros to the new
Once again, I am the minority doing fine with iKey2 :-)
The only stoopid thing on iKey is that it doesn't look up app ID.
Instead, it looks up for app name str. This means you need to modify
when you update your target app. This is a bit frustrating.
Do you know if QK handles app ID? Not
Hey Johannes,
It's actually possible to go back to iKey 1.07. I didn't realize it,
but iKey backs up your old shortcuts when you upgrade, so provided you
didn't manually delete them, you can go back any time. I'm back on
iKey 1.07 now and am much happier.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Apr 7, 2005 9:24 AM, A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you know if QK handles app ID? Not that I am leaving iKey2, but
curious :-)
I'm not sure about the technical side of app recognition, but every
time I update Finale (from 2005a to 2005b, for instance), I have to
change the
On Apr 7, 2005 2:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing
incomprehension of why the Mac UI is superior to their own.
At least youse
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an a$%hole.
Oh well.
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
On Apr 7, 2005 11:29 AM, Johannes Gebauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an
a$%hole.
Oh well.
Interesting... the
On 07 Apr 2005, at 2:29 PM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Well, we Mackers ...
Oh dear, I never thought I would consider myself a Macker, which in
German means something in between having a screw loose and being an
a$%hole.
Oh well.
I believe the preferred term for Apple
I'm discussing with another composer the advisability of combining multiple
instruments on a single orchestral part, and thought I'd pose this question
to the group. My contention is that a) orchestral wind players dislike
multiple instruments on a single part (I'm talking about, say, Oboe 1 2,
On 7 Apr 2005 at 5:24, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing incomprehension
of why the Mac UI is superior to their own.
At least
I would characterize your points a, b, and c as best practice as opposed to
common practice. Unfortunately, especially with more recent materials, common
practice diverges considerably from best practice.
I'm a horn player. My first preference is separate parts. If I have to work
from a
On 7 Apr 2005 at 16:27, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 07 Apr 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
And don't get me started on the 1-button mouse!
That's just what Apple happens to ship with its computers. OS X
natively supports all standard 3-button scrolling mice, without the
need
On 7 Apr 2005 at 16:21, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
David W. Fenton / 05.4.7 / 03:54 PM wrote:
Well, while I criticize MS for never really getting the Mac UI when
they copy surface features of it, the dogma of the mouse on the Mac
is even more ridiculous. I know that the studies show that mousing
On 07 Apr 2005, at 3:54 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
And don't get me started on the 1-button mouse!
That's just what Apple happens to ship with its computers. OS X
natively supports all standard 3-button scrolling mice, without the
need for any third-party drivers.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL
At 12:12 PM -0700 4/7/05, Lee Actor wrote:
I'm discussing with another composer the advisability of combining multiple
instruments on a single orchestral part, and thought I'd pose this question
to the group. My contention is that a) orchestral wind players dislike
multiple instruments on a
In answer to your question of whether to combine wind
parts, I would give a definite it depends.
Yes, French publishers, particularly Durand et Cie.
follow this style. As a performer, I think it helps
sight reading, since you can follow the other part if
you have a rest. If you know that your
Brad Beyenhof schrieb:
Interesting... the LEO English-German dictionary translates Macker
only as bloke, fellow, or guy: http://tinyurl.com/7xb8l
That's a pretty mild way of translating it, considering the root of the
word is Macke, and someone who has a Macke literally has a screw
loose. In
Run the Cautionary Accidentals plugin on just those measures. Click on
Diatonic Accidentals, and un-select the other options unless you want
them applied, too.
Christopher
On Apr 7, 2005, at 10:56 AM, Stan Lord wrote:
I have a piece with a few bars in A major.
Just for these bars I want to
I am a horn player.
I would much rather have separate single parts than parts showing 1st
2nd horns together. They are difficult to read at speed and even worse if
there is only one copy of the double part provided.
If you must use combined parts, please, please, NEVER put 1st 3rd and
On Apr 7, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Apr 7, 2005 2:24 AM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Apr 6, 2005, at 9:48 PM, David W. Fenton wrote:
This change in WinXP is a massive stupidity, with absolute no
logical justification, except Microsoft's continuing
incomprehension of why the Mac UI
The traditions of orchestral playing often suggest that certain parts SHOULD
be combined on one part.
If the 1st and 2nd horns are essentially playing a homophonic texture then
they should be on one part but separate staves. The same for 3rd and 4th.
If they are playing a polyphonic texture
I've been using Quickeys as well with great results. I got the best
results by recording my shortcut first and then fine tuning the
shortcut after the whole thing was recorded.
-Karen
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Hi folks,
I'm curious if anyone is using and/or having success with the Apply Human
Playback plugin. The balances I'm getting are somewhat screwy, and I don't
recall that being a problem a couple of months ago, last time I used it.
For example, after applying the plugin the strings got very soft
Hi gang,
For those of you who *are* early adopters, Amazon has a $35 mail-in
rebate if you pre-order Mac OS X 10.4, which is due out by the end of
the month.
http://tinyurl.com/4v336
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
29 matches
Mail list logo
