Whatever was changed with the list now, was not the correct setting. The
list now doesn't include a reply-to header at all anymore, making
replying to the list more difficult.
Please can we either have the old behaviour back, or the correct setting?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
(Finale 2002)
I have been experiencing odd spacing between notes that, so far, appears to
affect a single quaver (eighth note) tied to another note with stems up.
These notes, using note spacing, are too far apart. I attempted to
correct this by changing the minimum distance between
Michael,
what is the minimum distance between items set to?
If you like you can send a file to me personally and tell me where the
problems are, and I will have a look at it tomorrow. It's hard to tell
from the distance.
Johannes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
(Finale 2002)
I have been
Le 05-08-14 à 04:38, Johannes Gebauer a écrit :
Whatever was changed with the list now, was not the correct
setting. The list now doesn't include a reply-to header at all
anymore, making replying to the list more difficult.
Please can we either have the old behaviour back, or the correct
Yes, please let's have the old reply-to setting back -- it worked
correctly for the vast majority of list members. This new setting
works correctly for no one.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Thanks for your mail. My computer is going into the shop today, and I am away
until Labor Day. I will try to check my email/phone periodically...if you have
sent an mp3 for evaluation, it will take place after Labor Day (Sept. 5th). If
you are a Berklee student looking for an ensemble waiver, I
On 14 Aug 2005 at 10:05, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
e. the screen doesn't always update appropriately when you click a
note. In some cases you have to force a redraw to see the lyrics
you've just assigned, and in some weird circumstances I can't
identify, Ctrl-D does not repaint the
On 14 Aug 2005 at 10:38, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Whatever was changed with the list now, was not the correct setting.
The list now doesn't include a reply-to header at all anymore, making
replying to the list more difficult.
Please can we either have the old behaviour back, or the correct
If one creates feathered beams according to the Manual (Finale 2005), i.e. inputs notes as the smallest note value and with special tools angles the beams as needed, there are leftover rests in the bar. Making them invisible still leaves the playback, the lineup etc. all messed up. Is there a
Le 05-08-14 à 15:54, dr.a.s. weinstangel a écrit :
Also, is it possible to reduce the size of icons in the pallettes,
in order to take less space along the margins of the screen?
The palette called Traditional will take the less space among the
choices given, I think. Other than having
On 14 Aug 2005 at 7:23, Eric Dussault wrote:
Le 05-08-14 à 04:38, Johannes Gebauer a écrit :
Whatever was changed with the list now, was not the correct
setting. The list now doesn't include a reply-to header at all
anymore, making replying to the list more difficult.
Please can
On 14 Aug 2005 at 11:53, Darcy James Argue wrote:
Yes, please let's have the old reply-to setting back -- it worked
correctly for the vast majority of list members. This new setting
works correctly for no one.
I would agree with that, if the only choices are no Reply-To and the
duplicated
David W. Fenton schrieb:
Well, I think that font has hideously ugly numbers. I much prefer the
numbers to be more of a text font type of font, rather than similar
to fat time signature and fingering numbers.
Absolutely, that's one reason I made my own font. Which is actually not
very
Larry Kent schrieb:
Well, I'm a big fan of Ansgar Krause's figured bass font, but I would
also like to see a different type face for the numbers (or perhaps a
choice. . . a font for the font???). That capability would also be
helpful for entering editorial figures in a not-too-radical italic
On 15 Aug 2005 at 0:27, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Sometimes, especially with
French figured bass it does matter which way a 6 is slashed.
That's actually news to me! I try to maintain the exact orthography
of the source, in case there's something like that, but I didn't
actually know there
On 15 Aug 2005 at 0:27, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
David W. Fenton schrieb:
[]
That's another reason why I made my own font. I used the same keyboard
layout pretty much as Ansgar, but with more variants of slashed
figures.
While I don't know that converting the variant of figures
in a
16 matches
Mail list logo
