Christopher Smith wrote:
I have to agree with Chuck. What were they thinking? Any tiny flaws in
the mics or A/D conversion is completely obliterated by the mp3
encoding, which introduces WAY more audio skewing than any of these
machines ever originally showed.
Are you talking about the
On 8-May-08, at 5:12 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
I have to agree with Chuck. What were they thinking? Any tiny
flaws in the mics or A/D conversion is completely obliterated by
the mp3 encoding, which introduces WAY more audio skewing than any
of these machines ever
On 07.05.2008 A-NO-NE Music wrote:
You do not wish to use limiter. The result is terrible. If you record
in 24-bit, you can set the input level at -10db peak, and you still get
full resolution. I personally set at -16db. Just a habit.
The mic pres will still have more noise...
Johannes
--
On 07.05.2008 Darcy James Argue wrote:
And I'm sorry, but the idea that there is no way something this small could sound
great is absurd. It's the microphones used that make the most difference -- the
recorder itself makes comparatively little difference.
This is definitely true to a certain
That's kind of what I wanted to know.
Thanks,
Dean
On May 7, 2008, at 11:53 PM, dc wrote:
David W. Fenton écrit:
I've been wanting something like this to use to record rehearsals of
my viol consort so we can use the recordings to make ourselves hear
our own playing better, and I'm wondering
On May 8, 2008, at 2:12 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Christopher Smith wrote:
I have to agree with Chuck. What were they thinking? Any tiny flaws
in the mics or A/D conversion is completely obliterated by the mp3
encoding, which introduces WAY more audio skewing than any of these
machines ever
Dear list,
What is the easiest and quickest way to transfer the bars-per-staff layout
from one linked part to another in Finale 2007 or 2008?
For example, I created a big band score in which the four trumpets are tutti
- i.e. they have the exact same part, rhythmically and form-wise, but have
