Re: [Finale] Dorico 2

2018-06-01 Thread Craig Parmerlee

On 5/31/2018 3:40 PM, David H. Bailey wrote:
While I'm disappointed that the major thrust of Dorico version 2 seems 
to be scoring to video, I realize that's a very large and growing 
segment of the notation/composition software market so it should be a 
means to even better cementing Dorico's future.


I did the free trial of Dorico 1.  I used it to do a re-transcription of 
several orchestral pieces that had multiple movements ("flows" in 
Dorico-speak) and some irregular meter / beat patterns.  It was slow 
going because of the learning curve but I was struck at how well the 
music layout happened, almost completely automatically.  I find myself 
spending many hours fiddling with Finale parts to get them to lay out 
reasonably.  It is clear to me that Dorico does many things (including 
layout) better and will save a lot of time.


However, for me, I must have slash notation and rhythmic notation 
because mostly I do jazz band arrangements.  And those things were not 
there in Dorico 1.  The final release of Dorico 1 included chord 
symbols, and they did a fantastic job with that -- much more coherent 
than Finale.


Dorico 2 adds slash and rhythmic notation, so I bought the crossgrade 
and am now working on my first jazz band project.  It is unfortunate 
that the product does not play back DS al coda, but that is not required 
in this project.


Anyway, I actually wanted to respond to your comment about video being 
the focus of 2.0.  Certainly that is part of it.  But a big portion of 
the "video support" is a better structure for varying tempos, and this 
can be useful even without video.  And this tempo business has been one 
of the most troublesome parts of Finale playback.  It seems we have been 
told more than a year ago that this was a big focus of Finale 
development, yet we haven't seen anything in that time.


Apart from video, I'd say there was a major effort to address 
jazz/pop/commercial writers as noted above.  And also there was a big 
focus on playback.  That is not just the Note Performer integration.  
They also have added depth to the "DAW portion" of Dorico with support 
for automation curves and unlimited controller functions.  This adds to 
the existing capabilities for MIDI editing separate from the notation 
itself (e.g, if a note sounds just a little too long, you can change the 
MIDI very easily without having to change the notation)  These things 
add up to major advancements.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu

[Finale] Finale playback problem

2018-06-01 Thread Steven Larsen
I’m experiencing a strange phenomenon when I playback my latest project.

It’s an orchestral score without key signature. I used the template wizard
to create the score, with the usual transposing instruments. When I play
back what I’ve entered, the cello and the flute play ½ step higher than
written. No problem in clarinets or horns. 

I’ve checked the staff and score manager settings, and they are the same as
the other instruments.

I’m using Garritan Instruments for playback; cellos are set to Cello section
KS.

It’s the latest version of Finale, with current updates.

Any ideas?

 

Steve Larsen

 

 

___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
https://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

To unsubscribe from finale send a message to:
finale-unsubscr...@shsu.edu