Because of the confusion in the forewords where I state I use italics
for editorial addtions.
You know Brian's house style, is it ok in your opinion for me to
change these dynamics back to italics?
Thanks Dennis! I hope you are doing well!
Kim
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:37 AM, dc den...@free.fr
On 9 Jan 2011 at 17:50, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
In several sources I am working on, instead of the usual 'f I have
'fort'
Is it considered legitimate to use italic bold if I am trying to
duplicate what the source has or just use simple italics? It's
definitely easier bolded, and plus the
I removed the italics, because after your comment, I realize that
typically in my own editions, I use italics for editorial additions.
I initially use them because in the sources, dynamics are written in
an italic script. I guess that's bad on my part.
Here's a screen shot of what I have now:
On 9 Jan 2011 at 18:25, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
I removed the italics, because after your comment, I realize that
typically in my own editions, I use italics for editorial additions.
I initially use them because in the sources, dynamics are written in
an italic script. I guess that's bad on
Curious, why do you have the repeat sign on the other side of the time
signature?
On Jan 9, 2011, at 3:25 PM, Kim Patrick Clow telem...@gmail.com wrote:
I removed the italics, because after your comment, I realize that
typically in my own editions, I use italics for editorial additions.
I
Because it's within a sub-section of a multi-section movement, that's
not the start of a new movement, even though it looks like one.
Tempo di Minuetto - Allegro with a Da capo marking at the end to
repeat the first section up to the fermata.
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Ryan Beard
I would consider it legitimate, especially if duplicating a source.
Consistency is king.
It should have a full-stop after it as it is an abbreviation.
Steve P.
On 9 Jan 2011, at 22:50, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Good day:
In several sources I am working on, instead of the usual 'f I have
At 5:50 PM -0500 1/9/11, Kim Patrick Clow wrote:
Good day:
In several sources I am working on, instead of the usual 'f I have 'fort'
Is it considered legitimate to use italic bold if I am trying to duplicate
what the source has or just use simple italics? It's definitely easier
bolded, and
