Hooray! Sparks flying on the Finale list! :)
To be honest, I never fail to be somewhat amused at the fact that complaints
about non-Finale-related thread inevitably result in threads even longer
than the ones complained about.
I too am very much in the if you don't like it, you don't have to
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Colin Broom
Sent: Thursday, 14 July 2005 11:08 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: [Finale] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?
Hooray! Sparks flying on the Finale list! :)
To be honest, I never fail to be somewhat amused
Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Sibelius discussion was directly related to the future of Finale and
the kind of features and approach we'd like to see Finale emulateĀ
And why
is it always the lurkers who never contribute solutions to Finale problems
(or contribute to the
Colin Broom wrote:
[snip] I'd be interested in hearing more about Finale in education
elsewhere.
I've always had this (probably largely unfounded) idea that Finale is
for the most part still the prominent product in the States, is this true?
The brand new high school plus the rebuilt older
] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?
On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote:
I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a Finale
site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and having it
taken
over by Mac users. Or GM taken over by Ford owners. I'm glad Sibelius
users
PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?
On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote:
I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a
Finale
site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and having it
taken
over by Mac users. Or GM
] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?
On 12 Jul 2005 at 18:20, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote:
I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a
Finale site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and
having it taken over by Mac users. Or GM
ronan schrieb:
Cool down, Man! I have as much right to voice my opinion as any other member
of the list. I have been very active in other forums for the past several
years, taking part in discussions and helping novices with their problems.
Just because I'm new to this list serve does not
Anyhow, let's drop the whole thing.
Ron
Sounds good, but stick around. The tides of topics come and go. Some here
will remember the (it seems like) hundreds of messages over the question of
when the 20th Century actually ended. Ultimately, though, you will find that
this list is a tremendous
Yes.. This List has always been a valuable resource when I
needed an
answer about Finale.
Ron should be forgiven for not knowing that it is futile to suggest that a
topic be dropped on the Finale List...I have been wearing out my delete
key recently too, and I don't recall hearing such anger
Richard Yates wrote:
Anyhow, let's drop the whole thing.
Ron
Sounds good, but stick around. The tides of topics come and go. Some here
will remember the (it seems like) hundreds of messages over the question of
when the 20th Century actually ended.
It's over? Yikes! Why wasn't I
At 9:25 AM -0400 7/13/05, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
I have been wearing out my delete
key recently too,
This is a handy tip for some email programs:
In Eudora, for example, you can option-click on a subject line in the
mail box and it will quickly select and group all of the same subject
Hi Randolph,
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Ken Fowler
At 09:25 AM 7/13/2005 -0500, you wrote:
At 9:25 AM -0400 7/13/05, Eden - Lawrence D. wrote:
I have been wearing out my delete
key recently
At 12:19 PM 07/13/2005, D. Keneth Fowler wrote:
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Alt-click for Win Eudora. You can also Alt-click on a sender's name
to quickly group and select all email in the mailbox
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Regardless, your comments are totally out of line in what a list is
supposed to be. Is there something wrong with people who subscribe to a
list, but don't post? I'm on a number of
Just clicking on the header works fine in V5.
At 7/13/2005 12:47 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 12:19 PM 07/13/2005, D. Keneth Fowler wrote:
I am interested in your Eudora tip. Thanks for sharing. What is the
equivalent on a Windows keyboard of the Mac option key?
Alt-click for Win Eudora. You
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib stuff was neither OT nor TAN.
Get a life.
Phil Daley AutoDesk
http://www.conknet.com/~p_daley
Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Regardless, your comments are totally out of line in what a list is
supposed to be. Is there something wrong with people who subscribe to a
list, but don't
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Sibelius, then it becomes not related.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib
On Jul 13, 2005, at 2:27 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Sibelius, then it becomes not related.
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though
Very much related, since the whole point was to point out the
differences and shortcomings of Finale. It is not only related, it is
one of the many things that this list is concerned with.
Johannes
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Yes, some of it was. When people start asking HOW to do stuff in
Eric Dannewitz schrieb:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though to
label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sibelius discussion was neither TAN nor OT, and it has Sibelius in
the subject header. It was spot on topic.
Regardless, your comments are totally out
Well, that's unfortunate.
Johannes
Jari Williamsson schrieb:
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
My patience is already stretched with this. If you don't like the way
this list works you are free to go.
I go.
Best regards,
Jari Williamsson
___
Finale
On 13 Jul 2005, at 1:19 PM, Jari Williamsson wrote:
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
My patience is already stretched with this. If you don't like the way
this list works you are free to go.
I go.
Well, sorry to hear that. Why? (And why now?)
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 13 Jul 2005 at 8:29, ronan wrote:
Is this how it works here? Only well-known names are allowed to
publish complaints? If anyone else does, they are lurkers and
thread cops?
You are being taken to task not because you've posted, but because
you're complaining about what other people are
On 13 Jul 2005 at 9:50, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy though
to label OT and TAN in the subject header?
Yes, for OT or TAN posts. Neither the Sibelius or the archiving
threads are either OT or TAN. The Sibelius thread was about the
future
On 13 Jul 2005 at 11:27, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Phil Daley wrote:
At 7/13/2005 12:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Wow, I think that was a little uncalled for. Isn't the policy
though to label OT and TAN in the subject header?
The Sib stuff was neither OT nor TAN.
Get a life.
Yes,
Okay, I seem to have started a tempest in a teapot here. I joined this list
serve a week ago. There were days when all I saw where lists of Sibelius
this and Sibelius that. As a newcomer I was beginning to believe this was a
Sibelius list and that I had joined the wrong one. I thought, okay, this
I have seen so many Sibelius emails lately, and it is taking up lots of
space, that I would have thought there was a better place for
Sibelius-related issues (a Sibelius list?). Maybe they do have some
relevance to Finale, but I can't be bothered to read them.
Am I alone?
Michael Lawlor
Yes, they do have a relevance to Finale, and I personally think they are
vital for the future of Finale. Therefor I object to any attempts to
move this discussion elsewhere, or to end it prematurely.
If you don't want to read them, just don't read them. I am sure it won't
go on for much
In a message dated 12/07/2005 17:06:31 GMT Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have seen so many Sibelius emails lately, and it is taking up lots of
space, that I would have thought there was a better place for
Sibelius-related issues (a Sibelius list?). Maybe they do have some
No, Michael, you are not alone.
Ken Fowler
At 04:59 PM 7/12/2005 +0100, you wrote:
I have seen so many Sibelius emails lately, and it is taking up lots of
space, that I would have thought there was a better place for
Sibelius-related issues (a Sibelius list?). Maybe they do have some
or Sibelius list?
I have seen so many Sibelius emails lately, and it is taking up lots of
space, that I would have thought there was a better place for
Sibelius-related issues (a Sibelius list?). Maybe they do have some
relevance to Finale, but I can't be bothered to read them.
Am I alone
in
reading them either.
Ron
Ronald J Brown
-Original Message-
From: D. Keneth Fowler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2005 4:31 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Is this a Finale or Sibelius list?
No, Michael, you are not alone.
Ken Fowler
At 04:59 PM 7/12/2005 +0100
On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote:
I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a Finale
site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and having it
taken
over by Mac users. Or GM taken over by Ford owners. I'm glad Sibelius
users
like their product and want
Darcy James Argue schrieb:
Then don't.
Seriously, what is the point of this thread? The Sibelius discussion
was directly related to the future of Finale and the kind of features
and approach we'd like to see Finale emulate. If that's not an
appropriate topic for discussion, then what
On 12 Jul 2005 at 18:20, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 12 Jul 2005, at 6:10 PM, ronan wrote:
I must admit, I was surprised to see all the Sibelius notes on a
Finale site. It's sort of like having a site for Windows users and
having it taken over by Mac users. Or GM taken over by Ford
I, too, appreciate the Sibelius threads.
I'm not interested in changing any time soon, and many of the
discussions on Sibelius I've only skimmed. (This List has been so busy
lately, I can't keep up with all of it!) But ultimately, what I'm
interested in is whatever software product is best
38 matches
Mail list logo
