Re: [Finale] OT: NOT John Cage's first national TV appearance!

2007-06-04 Thread arabushk
And one of the pleasures of siscovering Indian music was finding a cogent system where that seventh DIDN'T have to go up and the fourth DIDN'T have to go down. Another way to break the tyranny of the major and minor modes! Aaron J. Rabushka [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.waymark.net/arabushk

Re: [Finale] OT: NOT John Cage's first national TV appearance!

2007-06-04 Thread Aaron Rabushka
Discomforting and endlessley intriguing--a transcendant artistic experience! Aaron J. Rabushka [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://users.waymark.net/arabushk ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] OT: NOT John Cage's first national TV appearance!

2007-06-03 Thread Dick Hauser
On Jun 2, 2007, at 4:14 PM, John Howell wrote: So everybody's right and we can stop arguing, OK? Party Pooper Dick H ;-) ___ Finale mailing list Finale@shsu.edu http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale

Re: [Finale] OT: NOT John Cage's first national TV appearance!

2007-06-03 Thread David W. Fenton
On 2 Jun 2007 at 19:14, John Howell wrote: In functional harmony it is the pull of the halfstep between 3 and 4 that moves the harmony away from the tonic and into the subdominant region Even in isolation I do not hear the pull of this half step as from 3 to 4, but from 4 to 3. The third

Re: [Finale] OT: NOT John Cage's first national TV appearance!

2007-06-02 Thread John Howell
Perhaps it's time to talk about the Emancipation of the Dominant? (By which I mean the major-minor 7th chord, or any extension thereof.) Debussy did a pretty fair job of emancipating the major-minor 7th from its dominant function, and using it as a freestanding sonority with perfect integrity