Re: [Finale] Phrasing/beaming

2004-06-23 Thread Allen Fisher
At times it would help the layout process if 3 and 3 were used (stem directions would shift), and since I am using slurs it seems to me that 3 and 3 with a slur would, interpretively, be the same as 6 beamed together, so if I can help myself using 3 and 3 it's acceptable. Agree or

Re: [Finale] Phrasing/beaming

2004-06-23 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jun 23, 2004, at 6:38 AM, Allen Fisher wrote: This is how my primary client works. He expects me to take his very bad chicken scratch scores and turn them into something others can read easily. He doesn't care how it is done. He trusts me to make descisions on layout and beaming. Yep, that

Re: [Finale] Phrasing/beaming

2004-06-23 Thread Owain Sutton
Mark D Lew wrote: On Jun 23, 2004, at 6:38 AM, Allen Fisher wrote: This is how my primary client works. He expects me to take his very bad chicken scratch scores and turn them into something others can read easily. He doesn't care how it is done. He trusts me to make descisions on layout and

[Finale] Phrasing/beaming

2004-06-22 Thread Richard Huggins
I am engraving some piano works where also I've been given quite a bit of latitude as regards editing-type decisions. In some situations of arpeggiated LH passages the composer sometimes has, for example, used 6 notes beamed togather (12/8 meter) or other times 3 and 3. There's no material

Re: [Finale] Phrasing/beaming

2004-06-22 Thread Mark D Lew
On Jun 22, 2004, at 2:53 PM, Richard Huggins wrote: I am engraving some piano works where also I've been given quite a bit of latitude as regards editing-type decisions. In some situations of arpeggiated LH passages the composer sometimes has, for example, used 6 notes beamed togather (12/8